Prompts
Legal AI Prompt-Bibliothek
Sofort einsetzbare Prompts für Entwürfe, Prüfungen, Recherche, Compliance und mehr. Filtern Sie nach Rechtsordnung, Anwendungsfall, Rechtsgebiet oder Komplexitätsstufe.
Angezeigt 391 Prompts
Draft Me an NDA — Ask Me the Questions First
Draft me an NDA. Before you write a word, ask me the questions that change the document, and wait for my answers. At a minimum ask: who is disclosing and is it one-way or mutual; the governing law and the courts; the purpose the information may be used for; how long confidentiality lasts after the term ends; whether trade secrets get a longer or indefinite tail; the permitted recipients; whether residual knowledge is carved out; return or destruction of materials; and whether injunctive relief is available in that jurisdiction without proving loss. Ask them as a numbered list in one message. Then draft. After the draft, give me three things: the two clauses most likely to be negotiated and my fallback on each; any clause that would not be enforceable in the jurisdiction I named; and a one-line note on whether a mutual NDA actually serves me here or whether I am giving away protection I did not need to. Do not produce a generic template with no questions asked — that is the version I can already get anywhere.
Red-Flag Review and Score From One Side's Position
Analyse the attached document. I act for [party], and the governing law is [jurisdiction]. Return, in this order: 1. A table of red flags. Columns: clause reference, the risk in one line, severity (high / medium / low), and the specific words that create it. Sort by severity. 2. What is missing that should be there. Judge the document against what a competent lawyer would expect for this type of agreement in this jurisdiction, not against a generic checklist. 3. Strengths — the clauses that already work in my client's favour, so I do not trade them away. 4. A score out of 10 from my client's perspective, with the reason for the score in two lines. Then say what the score would be from the counterparty's perspective, because a document that scores 9 for both sides is usually a document nobody has read properly. 5. The three fixes that move the score most, each written as replacement wording I can paste in. Mandatory rules: quote the actual clause text you are relying on — never paraphrase a clause and then critique your own paraphrase. If a risk depends on a fact outside the document, say which fact. If the document is incomplete or a page is unreadable, say so before analysing.
What Needs Urgent Attention in This File
Read the attached file and tell me what needs urgent attention. Assume I have ten minutes. Return: 1. The three things that matter most, each in one sentence, ordered by how soon they bite. 2. Every date in the document that creates a deadline, an expiry, a notice period or a limitation cut-off — as a table of date, what happens on that date, and who has to act. Flag any that has already passed. 3. Anything that is missing, unsigned, undated, blank or internally inconsistent. 4. Anything that commits my client to money, an indemnity, an exclusivity or an automatic renewal. 5. One line: if I do nothing this week, what is the worst thing that happens. Mandatory rules: lead with the deadlines — a risk with a date beats a risk without one. Do not pad the list to reach three items; if only one thing is urgent, say only one thing is urgent. Give the page or clause reference for every point so I can check it myself.
Tabular Risk Assessment of an Attached Document
Conduct a tabular risk assessment of the attached document. Output the table first and the commentary after it, so I can paste the table straight into a client note. Columns: clause, obligation or right created, who it binds, risk if it operates against us, likelihood (high / medium / low), impact (high / medium / low), residual risk after any existing mitigation in the document, and recommended action. After the table: 1. The three rows I should take to the client first, and why those three. 2. Anything in the document that creates a deadline or a notice obligation, extracted into a dated list. 3. Anything that survives termination, listed separately. Mandatory rules: one row per clause that carries risk — do not merge unrelated clauses into a single row to make the table shorter. Leave a cell blank rather than guessing. If a clause is ambiguous, put both readings in the row and mark it as ambiguous, because ambiguity is itself the risk.
Jurisdiction Research With Verified Citations
Research this question under the law of [jurisdiction]: [state the question]. This is a stress test, not a final opinion. Mandatory rules, and I will check them: 1. Never invent a statute, an article number, a case name or a citation. If you do not know, write 'not found' and move on. 2. Separate what the text says from what the case law has settled from what is your own reasoning. Label each paragraph with which of the three it is. 3. Where a point is genuinely contested, give both positions and say which is the majority view and how confident you are. 4. Flag every proposition that I must verify against the official gazette or a primary source before I rely on it. Structure: (a) the short answer in three lines; (b) the applicable texts, article by article; (c) the analysis applied to my facts; (d) the counter-argument the other side will run and how strong it is; (e) what facts I still need to give you; (f) a verification list of everything to check before this leaves the office. Do not soften the answer to be helpful. If my position is weak, say it is weak in the first three lines.
Exceptional Rent Law: Eviction and Extension Position
I act for the [landlord/tenant] in a residential property in [area] in Lebanon governed by the exceptional rent law. Facts: occupancy began [date], current rent [amount], estimated sale value of the premises [amount], tenant's position towards the Fund [beneficiary / not a beneficiary / applied once and never renewed]. Deliverables: 1. Determine whether the statutory extension years have run, computing each period from the date the law took effect. 2. Calculate the fair rental value and the annual increases due, stating the legal basis for every figure. 3. Explain how benefiting from the Fund — or failing to renew the application annually — changes the tenant's position. 4. Identify the competent court for an eviction action and the procedural deadlines. 5. Set out my client's options ranked strongest to weakest, with the risk attached to each. Mandatory rules: rely on the statutory text and Lebanese case law, and cite the article number every time. Where a point is genuinely contested in the case law, say so rather than picking a side without authority. Do not invent article numbers or judgments.
Statement of Defence Against a Served Writ
Attached is a writ served on my client before the [court] in Lebanon. Draft a full statement of defence following Lebanese civil procedure. Structure: 1. On form: every available procedural objection (lack of jurisdiction, nullity, inadmissibility, limitation), flagging which ones are waived unless raised before pleading to the merits. 2. On the merits: answer each allegation in the writ, paragraph by paragraph, with the legal basis and the document that answers it. 3. Counterclaims where the conditions are met. 4. The schedule of exhibits to be produced, and what is missing from it. 5. A prayer for relief in filing-ready form. Mandatory rules: cite the article of the Code of Civil Procedure or the substantive law behind every objection. Put in square brackets every fact the writ does not supply and that you need from me. Do not invent case law or article numbers; where you are unsure, say so.
Enforceability of a Liability Cap Under UAE Law
The attached contract caps liability at [amount / a multiple of fees] and excludes [consequential loss / loss of profit / gross negligence]. Governing law is UAE law, forum [onshore courts / DIFC / ADGM / arbitration]. Advise: 1. Is the cap enforceable as drafted before the stated forum, and on what statutory basis. 2. Which carve-outs are mandatory and cannot be excluded whatever the parties agreed — address fraud, gross negligence, wilful misconduct, death and personal injury, and any decennial or statutory liability that applies. 3. How an onshore court's treatment differs from DIFC or ADGM on the same wording. 4. Whether the cap survives if the contract is terminated or found void. 5. Redraft the clause so it holds up, and mark each change with the reason. Mandatory rules: cite the Civil Transactions Law or Commercial Transactions Law article for every proposition. Where onshore and the financial free zones diverge, set them out side by side rather than blending them. Do not cite a judgment you cannot name.
Non-Compete Validity Under UAE Labour Law
Assess a non-compete under UAE labour law. Facts: employee role [role], duration of the restriction [period], geographic scope [scope], activities covered [activities], salary [amount], reason employment ended [resignation / termination / expiry], and whether any consideration was paid for the restraint [yes/no]. Advise: 1. Whether the clause meets the statutory conditions on duration, place and type of work, and what the law requires for each. 2. What the employer must prove for a court to enforce it, and the practical evidentiary burden. 3. The circumstances in which the restriction falls away by operation of law. 4. The remedies actually available — damages, injunction, labour-ban consequences — and which of them a UAE court will realistically grant. 5. A redrafted clause that stands the best chance of enforcement, plus a fallback clause if the primary one is struck down. Mandatory rules: cite the article of the Labour Law and its Executive Regulations for each condition. Distinguish the position for an onshore contract from a DIFC or ADGM employment contract. Do not assert a court practice you cannot source.
Administrative Claim to Annul a Decision
Draft a full, reasoned statement of claim before the Court of First Instance (Administrative Division) in Oman to annul an administrative decision, complete as to form. Facts: issuing body [body], decision number and date [details], date of knowledge [date], subject matter [subject], the claimant's standing and interest [details], administrative grievance [filed on / not filed]. Deliverables: 1. Every formal particular the statement of claim must contain, and the consequence of omitting each. 2. Time: how the appeal period is computed from knowledge, publication or notification, the effect of a grievance on suspending time, and whether a grievance is mandatory here. 3. The grounds of annulment in order — lack of jurisdiction, defect of form or procedure, breach of law, misuse of power — and how each maps onto our facts. 4. The application to stay execution: the seriousness and urgency conditions and how to plead them. 5. The prayer for relief and the schedule of exhibits. Mandatory rules: cite the article for every formal requirement and every time limit. Put missing facts in square brackets. If the period appears to have expired, say so first, before anything else.
Is Limitation a Matter of Public Order?
Answer the following under the law of Oman: is limitation a matter of public order? Address specifically: 1. Whether the court raises it of its own motion or the interested party must plead it. 2. At what stage it may be raised, and whether it is admissible for the first time on appeal or before the Supreme Court. 3. Whether the parties may agree in advance to lengthen, shorten or waive the limitation period, and the effect of an agreement that does. 4. How the answer differs between extinctive and acquisitive prescription, and between civil, commercial, employment and criminal matters where they diverge. 5. The effect of waiving limitation after it has already accrued. Mandatory rules: rely on the Omani Civil Transactions Law and the Civil and Commercial Procedure Law, citing the article number every time. If the answer varies by the nature of the action, set it out in a comparison table. Do not import a rule from another country's code and attribute it to Oman; where there is no express provision, say so.
Deadlines for Answer and Evidence in a Labour Claim
Under Jordanian law, what is the deadline for filing the answer and the evidence in a labour claim, and can it be extended? Address: 1. The statutory period for filing the statement of defence from the date of service, and the period for producing documentary evidence and the witness list. 2. Whether these periods are peremptory or directory, and the sanction for missing them. 3. The conditions for an extension: who has the power to grant it, whether an acceptable excuse is required, and how many times it may be granted. 4. The effect of the defendant failing to answer, both on the progress of the claim and on the ability to file evidence later. 5. How these periods differ from an ordinary civil claim, if they do. Mandatory rules: cite the article of the Code of Civil Procedure or the Jordanian Labour Law for every period, and state whether it runs in calendar days or working days and from what date. Do not invent an article number. If the provision has been amended, flag that the version in force must be checked.
Automatic Renewal of a Lease
Under Jordanian law: a lease contains an automatic renewal clause — does it renew once for an identical term only, or does it continue indefinitely unless one party gives notice? Address: 1. The rule on tacit renewal and the provision it comes from, and the term of the renewed lease. 2. The form of a notice of non-renewal: its deadline, how it must be served, and the effect of a late or irregular notice. 3. The effect of the tenant staying in occupation after expiry while the landlord continues to accept rent. 4. What the parties may validly agree to the contrary, and what is mandatory and cannot be varied. 5. The competent court and the time limits if it is disputed. Mandatory rules: cite the article of the Civil Code or the Jordanian Landlord and Tenant Law. If the answer differs between residential and commercial tenancies, or by the date the lease was made, say so expressly rather than giving one answer.
Standard NDA
Draft a mutual non-disclosure agreement between [Party A] and [Party B] for the purpose of evaluating a potential [describe transaction or project]. Include standard confidentiality obligations, permitted disclosures, term of [X] years, and governing law of [jurisdiction].
Put HAQQ to Work on My Actual Matter
Here is a real matter I am working on right now: [describe the matter in three or four lines, including the jurisdiction and who I act for]. Do not give me a feature list or a description of what you can do in general. Instead: 1. Tell me the three things you would do on this matter first, in order, and what each would produce. 2. Do the first one now. 3. Tell me exactly what to give you — which documents, which facts — to make the second and third worth doing. 4. Name the parts of this matter you should not be trusted with, and why. Anything that turns on a local filing practice, an unpublished decision, a court's current disposition, or a fact only the client knows. Answer as a colleague scoping a file, not as a product. If this matter is outside what you can usefully help with, say that in the first line.
Answer in the Language I Wrote In
Apply the following rules to every answer in this matter, and do not revert to English unless I ask: 1. Answer me in Arabic. Explain the analysis in clear language, while keeping statutory text and terms of art in precise formal Arabic exactly as they appear in the law. 2. When quoting a legal provision, reproduce it verbatim and then explain it — do not blend the quotation into the explanation. 3. When drafting a document that will be filed with a court or an official body, write it entirely in professional formal Arabic, whatever language my question was in. 4. If I write to you in dialect or in Latin characters, understand what I mean, answer in formal Arabic, and do not comment on how I typed it. 5. If you need a term that has no settled Arabic equivalent, give the foreign original in brackets once, at first mention. 6. For a bilingual document, put Arabic and English on the same page, section against section, and state which language governs in case of conflict. Confirm these rules in one line, then go straight to my question.
Strengths and Weaknesses of an Opponent's Pleading
Attached is a pleading filed by the opposing party in [jurisdiction]. Analyse it and set out its strengths and weaknesses, addressing the law in a way that fits the facts. Deliverables: 1. Break the opponent's allegations into a numbered list: each allegation, the legal basis it rests on, and the evidence relied on within the pleading itself. 2. For each allegation: is the evidence cited enough to make it out, and where is the gap between what is alleged and what is produced. 3. The procedural objections the pleading opens up for us, with the deadline for raising each. 4. The substantive defences, ranked by strength rather than in the pleading's own order. 5. The single most dangerous allegation against us, and what documents or witness evidence we need to meet it. 6. The risk of staying silent on a given point instead of answering it. Mandatory rules: quote the pleading verbatim for every observation. Distinguish clearly between what the pleading actually says and what you are inferring. Do not assume facts in our favour; where a fact is missing, ask me for it.
Amend a Template to Favour One Party
Make the necessary amendments so the attached template works in favour of [the disclosing party / the buyer / the landlord / the party I name]. Governing law is [jurisdiction]. Return: 1. A redline in table form: clause, current wording, proposed wording, and the reason in one line. Do not rewrite the whole document — change only what needs to change, and say so where a clause is already fine. 2. New clauses to insert, with the position in the document where each belongs. 3. Clauses to delete, with what my client gives up by deleting them, because a one-sided document that the counterparty refuses to sign is not a win. 4. A short negotiation note: which of these amendments the other side will accept without argument, which they will resist, and a fallback for each of the contested ones. 5. Anything I am asking for that would be unenforceable in this jurisdiction however it is drafted — tell me now rather than after signature. Mandatory rules: quote the current wording exactly as it appears. Keep the document's existing defined terms and numbering rather than introducing your own.
Case Strategy From the Client's Own File
Here are the facts and documents of my matter in [jurisdiction]: [set out the facts, or attach the file]. Build the case strategy: 1. A chronology of every fact with the document that proves it. Mark in a separate column any fact I have asserted with no document behind it — that column is the case. 2. The causes of action or defences genuinely open on these facts, each with its legal basis and the elements I must prove. 3. For each element: the evidence I already have, the evidence I need, and where I would get it. 4. The strongest three points in my case and the strongest three against it, stated as the other side would state them, not softened. 5. Forum and procedure: where to bring it, why there, the limitation position, and any pre-action step that is a condition of admissibility. 6. Realistic outcomes with a rough probability band for each, and what would change those odds. 7. A settlement range and the point at which litigating costs more than it recovers. Mandatory rules: do not assume a fact I have not given you. Where the strategy depends on a missing document, name the document. Give me the weaknesses before the strengths — a strategy memo that opens with our strong points is a memo written to be liked.
Procedural Objections Available on Service
My client has been served with a claim in [jurisdiction]. Before anything is said on the merits, list the procedural objections available. Facts: date of service [date], method [personal / at domicile / by publication / electronic], court [court], subject of the claim [subject], value [amount], the claimant's capacity [details]. For each possible objection give five things: 1. Its name and the provision that creates it. 2. The factual condition that must exist to raise it, and where that condition appears in our file. 3. The deadline and the stage at which it must be raised, and whether it is waived by delay or by addressing the merits first. 4. Its effect if upheld: dismissal, transfer, stay, or merely the correction of a step. 5. The tactical cost: what raising it reveals to the other side, and whether it hands them a chance to cure a defect they would otherwise have missed. Then order the objections by the sequence the law requires, not by their strength. Mandatory rules: cite the article for each objection. Where an objection is lost the moment we plead to the merits, mark it prominently. Do not propose an objection our facts do not support.
Full Contract Risk Review
Review the following contract: [PASTE CONTRACT TEXT OR ATTACH FILE]. Identify legal risks, unclear clauses, missing protections, and terms that may expose [COMPANY NAME] to financial or legal liability. Provide a structured report with these sections: - High risk clauses - Unclear or ambiguous language - Missing protections for [COMPANY NAME] - Clauses that strongly favor the other party - Suggested revisions in plain English End with a short summary of the top risks.
Memorandum of Understanding
Draft a memorandum of understanding between [Party A] and [Party B] regarding their intention to [describe collaboration or project]. Clearly distinguish binding and non-binding provisions, outline responsibilities, timeline, and path to definitive agreement.
Distribution Agreement
Draft a distribution agreement appointing [Distributor] as the [exclusive/non-exclusive] distributor of [products] in [territory]. Include minimum purchase commitments, pricing terms, marketing obligations, intellectual property provisions, term, and termination rights.
Service Agreement
Draft a services agreement where [Service Provider] will provide [describe services] to [Client]. Include scope of work, deliverables, payment terms of [amount/schedule], term of [duration], termination provisions, limitation of liability, and governing law of [jurisdiction].
Rechtsgebiet
Every practice area has its own page, with the full text of each prompt on it.
- Corporate / Commercial49
- Family Law37
- Disputes / Litigation34
- Legal Ops / Billing29
- Employment25
- Arbitration19
- Corporate / M&A17
- Housing & Tenancy17
- Small Business17
- Corporate Governance16
- Privacy & Data Protection16
- Employee Rights15
- FinTech / Payments14
- IP / Licensing14
- Real Estate (Personal)11
- Estate Planning10
- Immigration10
- Personal Tax10
- Islamic Finance & Sharia9
- Personal Injury9
- Debt & Bankruptcy8
- Criminal Defense3
- Citizen / Admin2
Rechtsordnung
Prompts written for one legal system, rather than a template with the country left blank.
What you need done
The same prompts, cut by the kind of work rather than the area of law.