प्रॉम्प्ट

वकीलों के लिए Disputes / Litigation एआई प्रॉम्प्ट्स

34 prompts you can paste straight into HAQQ or any other assistant. Every one is written out in full. Open it, copy it, change the bracketed parts.

• Jurisdiction Research With Verified CitationsMemoExpertResearch / Authorities

  I act for [party]. Research this question under the law of [jurisdiction]: [state the question].
  This is a stress test, not a final opinion. Mandatory rules, and I will check them:
  1. Never invent a statute, an article number, a case name or a citation. If you do not know, write 'not found' and move on.
  2. Separate what the text says from what the case law has settled from what is your own reasoning. Label each paragraph with which of the three it is.
  3. Where a point is genuinely contested, give both positions and say which is the majority view and how confident you are.
  4. Flag every proposition that I must verify against the official gazette or a primary source before I rely on it.
  Structure: (a) the short answer in three lines; (b) the applicable texts, article by article; (c) the analysis applied to my facts; (d) the counter-argument the other side will run and how strong it is; (e) what facts I still need to give you; (f) a verification list of everything to check before this leaves the office.
  Do not soften the answer to be helpful. If my position is weak, say it is weak in the first three lines.

• Statement of Defence Against a Served WritMemoExpertDraft / Generate

  I act for the defendant. Attached is a writ served on my client before the [court] in Lebanon. Draft a full statement of defence following Lebanese civil procedure.
  Structure:
  1. On form: every available procedural objection (lack of jurisdiction, nullity, inadmissibility, limitation), flagging which ones are waived unless raised before pleading to the merits.
  2. On the merits: answer each allegation in the writ, paragraph by paragraph, with the legal basis and the document that answers it.
  3. Counterclaims where the conditions are met.
  4. The schedule of exhibits to be produced, and what is missing from it.
  5. A prayer for relief in filing-ready form.
  Mandatory rules: cite the article of the Code of Civil Procedure or the substantive law behind every objection. Put in square brackets every fact the writ does not supply and that you need from me. Do not invent case law or article numbers; where you are unsure, say so.

• Is Limitation a Matter of Public Order?MemoAdvancedResearch / Authorities

  I am advising a client under Omani law. Answer the following: is limitation a matter of public order?
  Address specifically:
  1. Whether the court raises it of its own motion or the interested party must plead it.
  2. At what stage it may be raised, and whether it is admissible for the first time on appeal or before the Supreme Court.
  3. Whether the parties may agree in advance to lengthen, shorten or waive the limitation period, and the effect of an agreement that does.
  4. How the answer differs between extinctive and acquisitive prescription, and between civil, commercial, employment and criminal matters where they diverge.
  5. The effect of waiving limitation after it has already accrued.
  Mandatory rules: rely on the Omani Civil Transactions Law and the Civil and Commercial Procedure Law, citing the article number every time, and do not invent one. If the answer varies by the nature of the action, set it out in a comparison table. Do not import a rule from another country's code and attribute it to Oman; where there is no express provision, say so.

• Strengths and Weaknesses of an Opponent's PleadingMemoExpertReview / Redline

  I act for the responding party. Attached is a pleading filed by the opposing party in [jurisdiction]. Analyse it and set out its strengths and weaknesses, addressing the law in a way that fits the facts.
  Deliverables:
  1. Break the opponent's allegations into a numbered list: each allegation, the legal basis it rests on, and the evidence relied on within the pleading itself.
  2. For each allegation: is the evidence cited enough to make it out, and where is the gap between what is alleged and what is produced.
  3. The procedural objections the pleading opens up for us, with the deadline for raising each.
  4. The substantive defences, ranked by strength rather than in the pleading's own order.
  5. The single most dangerous allegation against us, and what documents or witness evidence we need to meet it.
  6. The risk of staying silent on a given point instead of answering it.
  Mandatory rules: quote the pleading verbatim for every observation. Distinguish clearly between what the pleading actually says and what you are inferring. Where you rely on a legal rule or a deadline to assess an allegation, name the provision; if you cannot, flag it for verification rather than asserting it. Do not assume facts in our favour; where a fact is missing, ask me for it.

• Case Strategy From the Client's Own FileMemoExpertStrategy / Scenario

  I act for the [claimant / defendant]. Here are the facts and documents of my matter in [jurisdiction]: [set out the facts, or attach the file].
  Build the case strategy:
  1. A chronology of every fact with the document that proves it. Mark in a separate column any fact I have asserted with no document behind it. That column is the case.
  2. The causes of action or defences genuinely open on these facts, each with its legal basis and the elements I must prove.
  3. For each element: the evidence I already have, the evidence I need, and where I would get it.
  4. The strongest three points in my case and the strongest three against it, stated as the other side would state them, not softened.
  5. Forum and procedure: where to bring it, why there, the limitation position, and any pre-action step that is a condition of admissibility.
  6. Realistic outcomes with a rough probability band for each, and what would change those odds.
  7. A settlement range and the point at which litigating costs more than it recovers.
  Mandatory rules: do not assume a fact I have not given you. Where the strategy depends on a missing document, name the document. Where an element or a limitation period rests on a legal rule, name the provision; if you are not certain of it, flag it rather than asserting it as settled. Give me the weaknesses before the strengths. A strategy memo that opens with our strong points is a memo written to be liked.

• Procedural Objections Available on ServiceChecklistAdvancedStrategy / Scenario

  I act for the defendant. My client has been served with a claim in [jurisdiction]. Before anything is said on the merits, list the procedural objections available.
  Facts: date of service [date], method [personal / at domicile / by publication / electronic], court [court], subject of the claim [subject], value [amount], the claimant's capacity [details].
  For each possible objection give five things:
  1. Its name and the provision that creates it.
  2. The factual condition that must exist to raise it, and where that condition appears in our file.
  3. The deadline and the stage at which it must be raised, and whether it is waived by delay or by addressing the merits first.
  4. Its effect if upheld: dismissal, transfer, stay, or merely the correction of a step.
  5. The tactical cost: what raising it reveals to the other side, and whether it hands them a chance to cure a defect they would otherwise have missed.
  Then order the objections by the sequence the law requires, not by their strength.
  Mandatory rules: cite the article for each objection. Do not cite an article you cannot verify; where you are unsure of one, say so rather than presenting it as certain. Where an objection is lost the moment we plead to the merits, mark it prominently. Do not propose an objection our facts do not support.

• Enforcing a Foreign Judgment in LebanonMemoExpertResearch / Authorities

  I act for the judgment creditor. A judgment was handed down in [country] against a Lebanese [company/individual] and we want it enforced in Lebanon.
  Facts: judgment dated [date], subject matter [subject], was the defendant represented in the proceedings [yes/no], is there a bilateral or multilateral judicial convention between Lebanon and [country] [yes/no/unknown].
  Deliverables:
  1. The conditions for granting exequatur, with the authority for each.
  2. The competent court and the documents required (translation, legalisation, service).
  3. The grounds of objection open to the judgment debtor, and which are heard on the merits versus on form.
  4. The effect of the defendant not having been properly served in the original action.
  5. The deadlines, and what does and does not stay enforcement.
  Mandatory rules: distinguish clearly between what the statute provides and what the case law has settled. Cite article numbers, and do not invent one. If you are not sure a bilateral convention exists, or of any other fact bearing on enforceability, say so rather than assuming it.

• Limitation Period Check Before FilingMemoAdvancedResearch / Authorities

  I act for the claimant. I need a limitation check before filing in Lebanon.
  Facts: nature of the right claimed [contractual / tortious / real / commercial / employment], date the right arose [date], date of knowledge of the damage if different [date], any interrupting or suspending event [formal notice, acknowledgement, earlier action, force majeure] and its date.
  Deliverables:
  1. The applicable period for this category of right and the provision it comes from.
  2. The starting point of the period: whether it runs from accrual or from knowledge.
  3. A timeline showing every interrupting or suspending event and its effect on the count.
  4. The conclusion: is the claim still admissible, and what is the safety margin in days.
  5. Whether limitation is raised by the court of its own motion or must be pleaded, and at what stage.
  Mandatory rules: cite the article number for every period, and do not invent one; where you are not certain of the period or its starting point, flag it for confirmation rather than presenting a single answer. Distinguish extinctive from acquisitive prescription. If the characterisation of the right changes the period, present both alternatives rather than choosing one.

• Commercial Claim on Unpaid InvoicesMemoAdvancedDraft / Generate

  Draft a statement of claim for sums due on commercial invoices under Qatari law. I act for the claimant.
  Facts: claimant company [name], defendant company [name], amount claimed [amount], invoice numbers and dates [details], basis of dealing [contract / purchase order / course of dealing], last part payment [date and amount].
  Deliverables:
  1. All the formal particulars of the statement of claim, and the court with jurisdiction by value, subject matter and place.
  2. A narrative of the facts tied to each invoice individually, with its due date.
  3. The legal basis of the claim, and interest or delay compensation and its limits under Qatari law.
  4. Proof in commercial matters: the evidential weight of invoices, commercial books and correspondence.
  5. The prayer: principal, interest, costs and legal fees, flagging what the courts do not usually award.
  6. An application for precautionary attachment where the conditions are met, and what is needed to file it.
  Mandatory rules: cite the article of the Commercial Law and the Qatari Civil and Commercial Procedure Law behind the limitation period, the interest rate and the evidential weight you claim for each proof. Warn me about any invoice that may be time-barred given its date, and put missing particulars in square brackets rather than inventing them.

• Two Copies, One Document: Discrepancy AnalysisReportExpertReview / Redline

  I act for the party holding copy (A). Attached are two copies of what should be the same document: copy (A) held by my client, and copy (B) produced by the other side.
  Deliverables:
  1. A precise discrepancy table: every difference in text, figure, date, stamp, signature or page order, quoting what each copy says.
  2. Classify each difference: transcription error, different edition, later alteration, or a substantive difference that changes the legal meaning.
  3. The legal effect of each substantive difference on my client's position.
  4. What can be established from the two documents alone, and what can only be resolved by expert examination or by comparison against the original or the official register.
  5. The procedural steps available: application to produce the original, an allegation of forgery, appointment of an expert, with the conditions and risks of each.
  Strict rule: do not conclude that a document is forged. Forgery is a judicial finding made by an expert on the original, not a textual comparison of scans. State what the differences do and do not show, quote the exact wording of each copy rather than paraphrasing it, and confine yourself to description and possibilities. If image quality does not support a reliable observation, say so.

• Appeal Scope: Challenging Part of a JudgmentMemoExpertStrategy / Scenario

  A judgment has been handed down in [jurisdiction] and I want to appeal part of it and not the rest. I act for the appellant.
  Facts: judgment dated [date], served on [date], the parts I accept [details], the parts I challenge [details].
  Deliverables:
  1. Whether a partial appeal is permitted in this jurisdiction, the provision, and whether not appealing the rest counts as accepting it.
  2. The effect of a partial appeal on the unchallenged parts: do they become final, and can they be enforced immediately.
  3. The risk of a cross-appeal: does it reopen what I thought was closed, and how do I limit that.
  4. How the appeal period is computed (from service or from delivery) and what interrupts or suspends it.
  5. The parts that are legally indivisible, so that appealing them pulls the rest of the judgment with them.
  6. A recommendation: is a partial appeal the right choice here, or a full appeal, and why.
  Mandatory rules: cite article numbers for the scope of appeal, the computation of the period and the indivisibility rule. If the answer differs between appeal and cassation, separate the two, and mark any point that turns on unpublished practice rather than the text of the code. If the period appears to have expired, tell me that before any other analysis.

• Demand LetterMemoAdvancedDraft / Generate

  You act for [Client] in a dispute with [Opposing Party] arising from [describe dispute], governed by [jurisdiction] law.
  Facts: the relationship or contract giving rise to the claim, the conduct complained of, and the loss suffered by [Client].
  Draft a demand letter that:
  1. States the legal basis for the claim, identifying the contractual clause, tort, or statutory provision relied on.
  2. Sets out the damages suffered of [amount], with the basis for that figure.
  3. Summarizes the evidence supporting the claim.
  4. Sets a deadline for response or payment before litigation is commenced.
  5. States the next step [Client] will take if the deadline passes without response.
  Mandatory rules: quote or cite the specific clause, provision, or authority the claim rests on rather than asserting a legal basis in general terms. If the applicable limitation period or procedural prerequisite under [jurisdiction] law is not certain, flag it for confirmation rather than assuming the claim is timely. This letter is a drafting aid for a qualified practitioner, not legal advice.

• Statement of ClaimMemoExpertDraft / Generate

  You act for [Client] against [Defendant] in [Court/Jurisdiction], for [describe cause of action].
  Facts: the events giving rise to the claim, in chronological order, the relationship between [Client] and [Defendant], and the loss [Client] has suffered.
  Draft a statement of claim covering:
  1. The parties and the court's jurisdiction to hear the claim.
  2. The factual background, pleaded as numbered paragraphs in chronological order.
  3. Each cause of action, with the elements of the claim and the facts that satisfy each element.
  4. The damages claimed, broken down by head of loss, with the basis for each figure.
  5. The relief sought, including any interim relief.
  6. Compliance with any pre-action or procedural requirement of [Court/Jurisdiction].
  Mandatory rules: plead each cause of action against a named statutory provision or established cause of action, not a general assertion of wrongdoing. Flag any limitation period, filing fee, or procedural rule of [Court/Jurisdiction] you cannot confirm, rather than assuming the claim is properly constituted. This is a drafting aid for a qualified practitioner, not a substitute for filing advice.

• Statement of DefenseMemoExpertDraft / Generate

  You act for [Defendant], responding to the claim brought by [Claimant's] in [Court/Case Number].
  Facts: defendant [Defendant], claimant [Claimant's], forum and matter [Court/Case Number], defenses to raise [describe defenses].
  Deliverables:
  1. A response to each allegation in the claim, admitted, denied, or stated to be beyond the defendant's knowledge, in the same numbering as the claim.
  2. The defenses set out in [describe defenses], each pleaded with its legal basis and the facts supporting it.
  3. Any counterclaim available on these facts, pleaded with the same structure as the main defense.
  4. A statement of relief sought.
  5. Procedural points, such as jurisdiction or limitation objections, if the facts support raising them.
  Mandatory rules: do not plead a defense or limitation period as available without a legal basis for it; where the basis is not given in the facts, flag it for confirmation before filing. This draft is a filing aid for a qualified practitioner to review before it is submitted to the court.

• Settlement AgreementAgreementAdvancedDraft / Generate

  You act for [Party A] or [Party B], as instructed, in settling the dispute between [Party A] and [Party B] arising from [describe dispute/litigation], governed by [jurisdiction] law.
  Facts: the claims in dispute, any pending proceeding and its case reference, and the terms already agreed in principle.
  Draft a settlement agreement covering:
  1. Recitals identifying [Party A] and [Party B] and the dispute being resolved.
  2. The settlement amount and payment terms, including timing and method of payment.
  3. Mutual releases, scoped to the claims each party is giving up.
  4. Confidentiality and non-disparagement obligations.
  5. Dismissal or withdrawal of any pending claims, and who bears the cost of doing so.
  6. Consequences of a breach of the settlement, including any default or acceleration clause.
  Mandatory rules: quote the specific claims and case reference being released rather than describing them generically, so the release is not broader or narrower than intended. Flag any term whose enforceability under [jurisdiction] law you cannot confirm rather than drafting it as settled. This agreement is a drafting aid for a qualified practitioner, not legal advice.

• Legal Opinion on DisputeMemoExpertResearch / Authorities

  You are preparing a legal opinion for [Client] analyzing the merits of [describe potential claim/defense] under [jurisdiction] law.
  Facts: client [Client], claim or defense in question [describe potential claim/defense], governing law and forum [jurisdiction], and the facts of the dispute as instructed by the client.
  Deliverables:
  1. The elements [Client] would need to establish, or that the opposing side would need to establish, for [describe potential claim/defense] to succeed.
  2. An assessment of liability exposure against those elements, applied to the facts given.
  3. Potential damages or remedies available, and how each would likely be calculated.
  4. Likelihood of success, stated as a range rather than a single number, with the reasoning behind it.
  5. Litigation risks: cost, time, disclosure exposure, and reputational factors.
  6. A recommended course of action, including whether settlement should be explored.
  Mandatory rules: cite the [jurisdiction] authority or provision behind each element and each damages calculation. Do not state a likelihood of success without the reasoning behind it. This opinion is a drafting and analysis aid for a qualified practitioner and is not a substitute for formal legal advice to the client.

• Discovery RequestMemoAdvancedDraft / Generate

  You are drafting discovery requests for [Client] in [Case Name/Number], to obtain evidence regarding [describe key issues].
  Facts: requesting party [Client], matter [Case Name/Number], key issues [describe key issues], procedural rules of [jurisdiction].
  Deliverables:
  1. Interrogatories: numbered questions targeting the facts in dispute.
  2. Requests for production: numbered requests, each specifying the document category and the time period covered.
  3. Requests for admission: numbered statements aimed at narrowing undisputed facts.
  4. A short note on scope, explaining why each category is relevant and proportionate to [describe key issues].
  5. Any objection you anticipate the opposing party will raise, and how the request is worded to withstand it.
  Mandatory rules: cite the specific discovery rule of [jurisdiction] that each request type relies on. Do not assume a page, item, or interrogatory limit; flag it for confirmation against the local rules before filing.

• Motion for Summary JudgmentMemoEnterpriseDraft / Generate

  You act for [Client] in [Case Name/Number] and are drafting a motion for summary judgment arguing that no genuine issue of material fact exists regarding [describe claims/defenses], and that [Client] is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
  Facts: moving party [Client], matter [Case Name/Number], claims or defenses at issue [describe claims/defenses], and the evidentiary record the client has provided.
  Deliverables:
  1. A statement of undisputed material facts, each fact tied to a specific piece of evidence in the record.
  2. The legal standard for summary judgment in the forum handling [Case Name/Number].
  3. Application of that standard to [describe claims/defenses], showing why no reasonable finder of fact could rule for the opposing party.
  4. Anticipated counterarguments the opposing party is likely to raise, and the response to each.
  5. Any partial summary judgment available if full judgment is not, and why it is worth seeking.
  6. A proposed order for the court to enter.
  Mandatory rules: cite the summary judgment standard and any authority relied on by name. Do not assert that a fact is undisputed unless the record given supports it, and flag any gap in the evidentiary record instead of filling it with an assumption. This draft is a filing aid for a qualified practitioner to review before submission.

• Witness StatementMemoAdvancedDraft / Generate

  You are preparing a witness statement for [Witness Name] in [Case Name/Number], to comply with [jurisdiction] procedural requirements.
  Facts: the events or facts within the witness's own knowledge, in the order they happened, and any document the witness will refer to.
  Draft the statement to include:
  1. The witness's identity, role, and basis of knowledge.
  2. A chronological narrative of [describe relevant events/facts], in the witness's own words.
  3. Factual observations only, separated from any opinion or inference the witness draws.
  4. Reference to any document or exhibit the witness relies on, by exhibit number.
  5. A statement of truth in the form required under [jurisdiction] procedural rules.
  Mandatory rules: include only what the witness actually observed or knows firsthand. Mark any fact the witness heard from someone else as hearsay and identify the source, rather than presenting it as the witness's own knowledge. Flag any procedural requirement of [jurisdiction] rules you cannot confirm.

• Litigation Hold NoticeMemoStandardDraft / Generate

  You are drafting a litigation hold notice for [Company] regarding [describe litigation/anticipated litigation]. Instruct recipients to preserve all documents, emails, and data related to [describe subject matter], explain the preservation obligation in plain terms including the consequences of failing to comply, and provide a contact for questions. Return a complete notice ready to circulate. Flag any preservation deadline or scope detail you cannot source from the facts given, rather than inventing one.

• Case Assessment MemoMemoAdvancedSummarize / Extract

  You act for [Client] in a dispute described as [describe dispute], governed by [jurisdiction] law.
  Facts: the background to the dispute, the parties involved, and the procedural stage reached so far.
  Prepare a case assessment memo covering:
  1. A summary of the facts as understood so far.
  2. The legal issues in dispute, with the provision or cause of action each one turns on.
  3. The strengths and weaknesses of [Client]'s position, argument by argument.
  4. The range of likely outcomes and an estimate of damages, with the assumptions behind the estimate stated.
  5. Strategic recommendations, including any step that should be taken before a limitation period or procedural deadline runs.
  Mandatory rules: cite the specific provision, precedent, or authority behind each legal issue rather than stating a conclusion unsupported. Flag any assumption behind the damages estimate that has not been confirmed, and mark any deadline you cannot verify under [jurisdiction] law for the client's local counsel to check. This memo is an analysis aid for a qualified practitioner, not legal advice to be relied on directly by the client.

• Injunction ApplicationMemoExpertDraft / Generate

  You act for [Client] in [Case Name/Number], seeking a [preliminary/permanent] injunction against [Defendant] to prevent [describe conduct], under [jurisdiction] procedural law.
  Facts: the conduct sought to be restrained, why it is imminent or ongoing, and the harm it will cause [Client] if it continues.
  Draft the application covering:
  1. The relief sought, framed precisely enough for the court to enforce if granted.
  2. Likelihood of success on the merits, with the cause of action and its elements.
  3. Irreparable harm: why damages would not adequately compensate [Client].
  4. The balance of hardships between granting and refusing the injunction.
  5. The public interest, if relevant to this type of conduct.
  6. Any undertaking [Client] must give, such as an undertaking in damages, required under [jurisdiction] procedural law.
  Mandatory rules: cite the specific procedural rule or test under [jurisdiction] law that governs the grant of a [preliminary/permanent] injunction rather than describing the test generically. Flag any factual assertion about urgency or harm that is not yet evidenced, marking it for confirmation before filing.

• Enforcement of JudgmentMemoAdvancedStrategy / Scenario

  You act for [Client], the judgment creditor, and are preparing a strategy memo for enforcing the judgment obtained against [Judgment Debtor] in [Case].
  Facts: judgment creditor [Client], judgment debtor [Judgment Debtor], matter [Case], and the assets or jurisdictions where the debtor is believed to hold assets, as described by the client.
  Deliverables:
  1. Available enforcement mechanisms in the jurisdiction where judgment was entered.
  2. An asset tracing plan: what to search, and what each search is likely to reveal.
  3. Domestication or recognition requirements if enforcement will cross into another jurisdiction.
  4. A comparison of enforcement routes by expected cost, time, and likelihood of recovery.
  5. Recommended sequence of enforcement steps, with the reasoning for that order.
  6. Risks that could reduce recovery, such as the debtor's ability to dissipate assets before enforcement begins.
  Mandatory rules: do not state that a specific enforcement mechanism or recognition treaty applies to [Judgment Debtor]'s jurisdiction unless it is named in the facts; otherwise flag it for confirmation by local counsel before the client relies on this memo. This memo is a strategy aid for a qualified practitioner, not a substitute for formal legal advice.

• Draft Reply to Department NoticeMemoAdvancedDraft / Generate

  Act as an experienced tax lawyer replying on behalf of [taxpayer name] to the following notice: [PASTE NOTICE].
  Facts: the tax authority that issued the notice [authority/department], the notice reference number and date [reference, date], the assessment year or period concerned [year/period], the amount in dispute [amount and currency], and the specific ground the notice raises [ground stated in notice].
  Deliverables:
  1. A restatement of the notice's allegation, in your own words, so the reader can confirm it was understood correctly.
  2. The factual response to each point raised in the notice.
  3. The legal provisions that support [taxpayer name]'s position, cited by section.
  4. Any judicial precedent that supports the position, cited by case name and citation.
  5. The relief or outcome requested.
  Mandatory rules: cite the specific section of the tax statute and the exact case citation for any precedent you rely on. Do not state that a provision or precedent supports the taxpayer's position unless you can name it; flag anything you cannot source for [taxpayer name]'s counsel to verify before the reply is filed. Maintain a formal tone throughout.

• Case Law Research PromptReportAdvancedResearch / Authorities

  Act as a legal researcher preparing case law on [topic] for [jurisdiction].
  Deliverables: identify the cases that matter most on this topic, typically three to six, and for each one provide:
  1. The case name and citation.
  2. The facts.
  3. The issue before the court.
  4. The court's decision.
  5. The practical takeaway for a practitioner.
  Order the cases from most to least significant to [topic], not by date.
  Mandatory rules: cite each case by its full name and citation, and quote the operative holding rather than paraphrasing it. Do not include a case you cannot cite precisely; if you are not certain a case exists as described, say so instead of presenting it as settled authority.

• Draft Legal NoticeMemoAdvancedDraft / Generate

  Act as counsel for [Client] drafting a legal notice on [issue], to be sent to [recipient].
  Facts: the events giving rise to the notice [describe], the date by which a response or remedy is demanded [date], and the governing law [jurisdiction].
  Deliverables:
  1. A statement of the facts giving rise to the notice.
  2. The legal provisions [Client] relies on, cited by section.
  3. The specific demand: what the recipient must do and by when.
  4. The consequences of non-compliance, stated only as far as [Client] is actually entitled to pursue them.
  Mandatory rules: cite the specific statute or contractual clause behind each legal provision and consequence stated. Do not state a remedy or penalty you cannot attribute to a named source; flag it for [Client]'s counsel to confirm before the notice is sent.

• Expert Witness Report OutlineReportExpertStrategy / Scenario

  Act as counsel advising [party] in [case type] proceedings. Create an outline for an expert witness report on [subject matter], covering:
  1. Qualifications summary: the expert's relevant credentials and experience.
  2. Instructions and scope: what the expert has been asked to address.
  3. Methodology: the approach and materials relied on.
  4. Factual assumptions: facts the expert is instructed to assume, kept separate from facts independently verified.
  5. Analysis framework: how the evidence is assessed against the relevant standard.
  6. Opinions: each stated separately, with the reasoning that supports it.
  7. Limitations and caveats: matters outside the expert's expertise, and assumptions that could change an opinion.
  Mandatory rules: flag any methodology, standard, or authority the outline cannot attribute to a named source, and do not present an opinion as established until the underlying reasoning is checked by the instructing lawyer and the expert.

• Settlement Agreement TemplateAgreementAdvancedDraft / Generate

  Act for [Party A] in negotiating a settlement, governed by the law of [jurisdiction]. Draft a settlement agreement between [Party A] and [Party B] resolving [dispute description], covering:
  1. Settlement amount and payment terms.
  2. Mutual releases.
  3. Confidentiality provisions.
  4. Non-disparagement clause.
  5. Representations and warranties.
  6. Dismissal with prejudice terms.
  7. Governing law and forum.
  Mandatory rules: do not state that a release or dismissal extinguishes a specific claim or right unless you can point to the clause doing so; flag any term whose enforceability depends on [jurisdiction] law you cannot confirm.

• Deposition Outline from Case FactsPlaybookAdvancedDraft / Generate

  Act as the deposing attorney. Build a deposition outline for [witness name or role] in [case name or description]. Organize by topic, not by document, and for each topic give: the question sequence, the answer you expect based on the facts provided, the follow-up question if the witness deflects, and the exhibit (by number) you would introduce to pin the answer down. Base every expected answer on the case facts and witness background given; where you have no basis for one, say so rather than inventing a plausible answer. End with the two or three admissions that would matter most if you got nothing else, and a rough time budget per topic. Case facts and witness background: [PASTE]. For the deposing attorney's use; strategy and admissibility calls remain the attorney's.

• Deposition Transcript Timeline and Contradiction FinderMemoExpertSummarize / Extract

  Act as case-prep counsel for [OUR SIDE]. Review the deposition transcript(s) below and produce: (1) a chronological timeline of the events the witness describes, citing each entry to a page:line reference; (2) a contradiction list of any statement that conflicts with something else the same witness said, or with another transcript if more than one is provided, quoting both sides with their page:line references; (3) the points where the witness hedged, said 'I don't recall,' or gave a materially different answer on a second attempt. Do not label anything a contradiction unless you can quote both sides, and do not summarize what a witness said without the page:line it came from. Transcript(s): [PASTE]. For attorney case-prep use only; this is a lead-generation pass, not a certified transcript summary. For every instance where the witness hedged or gave a materially different answer on a second attempt, quote the exact language relied on with its page:line reference rather than characterizing the change without the underlying text.

• Devil's Advocate Stress-Test of Our ArgumentMemoAdvancedStrategy / Scenario

  Take the argument below and argue against it as opposing counsel would, as hard as the facts and law honestly allow. Ground every counterargument in the facts and law already in our argument; if you rely on a fact, case or rule that is not in it, flag it as [UNVERIFIED] rather than presenting it as established. Identify the three weakest points in our position, the counterargument most likely to persuade a judge or arbitrator, and any factual gap the other side could exploit that we have not addressed. Then tell me, straight, whether the argument is strong enough to lead with or whether we should lead with a different theory. Our argument: [PASTE].

• Settlement Anchor and Walk-Away AnalysisMemoExpertStrategy / Scenario

  Act as settlement counsel for [OUR CLIENT] in [MATTER]. Scope: the facts, claim value, costs to date and procedural posture I give you below. Build the economics only from those figures. If a number is not supplied, name it as an input required and leave it blank; do not estimate it. Return: (1) Realistic Range: the low, likely and high outcomes if this runs to judgment, each tied to the specific fact or document that drives it; (2) Anchor, the opening number, plus the three facts we cite alongside it so it reads as reasoned rather than arbitrary; (3) Concession Path, the sequence of numbers we move through, the interval between moves, and what we ask for at each step so no move is free; (4) Walk-Away Point, the figure below which continuing is the better commercial choice, shown as a calculation from the inputs provided (expected recovery, remaining costs, delay, recoverability), with the arithmetic visible; (5) Their Alternative: what the other side gets by not settling, including their cost exposure and any deadline that pressures them; (6) Non-Monetary Terms, what we can trade instead of money (payment timing, confidentiality, scope of release, mutual or one-way, dismissal terms, references), ranked by what it costs us; (7) Risk Flags, anything that would move the range sharply, and the evidence that would resolve it; (8) Client Script, the short explanation the client hears, including the one sentence that frames the walk-away. Mark every input still needed as [INPUT REQUIRED] and do not fill it with an assumed figure. Facts and figures: [PASTE].

• Authority Verification: Does the Citation Support the Proposition?ReportExpertReview / Redline

  Act as a verification reviewer. For every authority cited in the passage below, check one thing only: whether the source actually supports the proposition it is cited for. Do not assess whether the argument is persuasive. If you cannot open or confirm a source, say so plainly and mark it Unverified. Never infer the content of a case, statute or regulation you have not read. Return: (1) Citation Table: one row per authority: Citation | Proposition it is cited for | Verdict (Supports / Partially supports / Does not support / Unverified); (2) Overstatements, where the proposition goes further than the source, quoting the source language beside the claim; (3) Wrong-Level Errors, dicta cited as holding, a dissent or minority view cited as the rule, a repealed or superseded provision, a first-instance decision presented as settled law; (4) Miscitations, wrong party, year, section, court or reporter, and pin cites that do not point to the passage relied on; (5) Currency Check: anything that may have been overturned, amended, distinguished or restricted since, flagged for manual confirmation together with the exact search a human should run; (6) Unsupported Assertions, legal propositions in the text carrying no citation at all; (7) Fix List, for each problem, the smallest change that repairs it (soften the claim, re-pin the cite, substitute authority, delete the sentence); (8) Sign-Off Verdict, safe to file, needs work, or do not file, in one line with the deciding reason. Passage: [PASTE].

• Adverse Authority Sweep: What the Other Side Left OutMemoExpertResearch / Authorities

  Act as a reviewer instructed to argue against the document below. Scope: the issue [ISSUE] in [JURISDICTION], on the record as it stands. Do not assume facts that are not in the document. Your job is to surface what a diligent opponent or a hostile judge would find and the draft does not address. Where you cannot confirm an authority exists and says what you think it says, mark it Unverified and leave it to a human. Return: (1) Omitted Adverse Authority: cases, statutes, regulations or guidance cutting against the position taken, each with what it holds and precisely why it hurts; (2) Distinguishable versus Fatal, split the above into items we can distinguish (with the distinguishing fact) and items that go to the heart of the argument; (3) Their Best Version, the strongest opposing submission on this issue, written in one or two paragraphs as they would write it, not as a summary; (4) Weak Links, the step in our chain of reasoning that fails first under pressure, and the question that exposes it; (5) Candour Items: authority that in [JURISDICTION] we may be obliged to disclose even though it is against us, flagged for a human to confirm against the local rules rather than asserted; (6) Answers, a short, usable response to each item marked fatal, or an honest statement that there is no good answer; (7) Research Gaps, the searches a human must run to close this out, written as actual queries with the database and date range; (8) Coverage Note, where your review may be incomplete and why. Document: [PASTE].

Search all 391 prompts