Prompt
Legal AI prompts: Summarize / Extract
10 prompts you can paste straight into HAQQ or any other assistant. Every one is written out in full - open it, copy it, change the bracketed parts.
Case Assessment MemoMemoAdvancedDisputes / Litigation
Prepare a case assessment memo for [Client] regarding [describe dispute]. Summarize the facts, identify legal issues, analyze strengths and weaknesses, estimate potential outcomes and damages, and provide strategic recommendations.
Due Diligence ReportReportExpertCorporate / M&A
Prepare a legal due diligence report on [Target Company] for [Client]. Summarize key findings, identify material risks, highlight red flags requiring attention, provide risk ratings, and recommend mitigation measures or deal protections.
Legal Department Annual ReportReportAdvancedLegal Ops / Billing
Draft an annual report template for [Company's] legal department covering matter statistics, spend analysis, significant matters, risk management activities, operational improvements, diversity metrics, and strategic priorities for the coming year.
Contract Summary for ExecutivesMemoStandardCorporate / Commercial
Summarize the following contract for a busy executive: [PASTE CONTRACT]. Create a one page briefing with these sections: - Purpose of the agreement - Key obligations for each party - Financial commitments - Legal risks - Termination conditions Write the summary in simple language so a non lawyer can understand the agreement in under three minutes.
Complex Law → Simple SummaryMemoStandardCorporate / Commercial
Summarize the following legal/tax provision in simple language suitable for a client. Include key points, compliance requirements, and practical implications.
Convert Complex Document into Key PointsReportStandardCorporate / Commercial
Analyze the following document and extract key legal issues, risks, and important points in bullet format.
Document-Set Summary & Contradiction FinderMemoExpertFamily Law
Summarize the document set below for a family-law matter and surface contradictions. Produce: (1) an issue-tagged summary, where each point cites the document and date/page it comes from; (2) a contradiction list — statements that conflict across documents or dates, each with both sources quoted; and (3) the open questions these documents raise. Do not assert anything without a citation back to the record, and label inferences as inferences. Documents: [PASTE OR DESCRIBE]. For attorney review only; summaries are leads, not evidence.
Case Chronology / TimelineReportAdvancedFamily Law
Build a case chronology for a family-law matter from the materials below. Produce a dated table: date, event, source (document name + page/date), and significance to the issues. Sort chronologically, mark any date that is approximate or disputed, and add a short note of the two or three patterns the timeline reveals (e.g., who had the children on key dates, when funds moved). Cite a source for every entry; if an event has no document support, list it separately as 'asserted, unverified.' Materials: [PASTE OR DESCRIBE]. For attorney review only.
Deposition Transcript Timeline and Contradiction FinderMemoExpertDisputes / Litigation
Review the deposition transcript(s) below and produce: (1) a chronological timeline of the events the witness describes, citing each entry to a page:line reference; (2) a contradiction list of any statement that conflicts with something else the same witness said, or with another transcript if more than one is provided, quoting both sides with their page:line references; (3) the points where the witness hedged, said 'I don't recall,' or gave a materially different answer on a second attempt. Do not label anything a contradiction unless you can quote both sides. Transcript(s): [PASTE]. For attorney case-prep use only; this is a lead-generation pass, not a certified transcript summary.
Hearing Transcript Digest by IssueMemoAdvancedArbitration
Digest the hearing transcript below by issue rather than by witness. For each issue in [list the issues in dispute], pull the testimony that supports our position, the testimony that supports the other side, and any admission against interest, each cited to a page:line reference. Flag any issue where the transcript is thin or silent, so we know where the post-hearing brief needs to lean on documentary evidence instead. Transcript: [PASTE]. Issues: [LIST].