Prompt
Prompt di IA legale per Legal Ops / Billing
20 prompts you can paste straight into HAQQ or any other assistant. Every one is written out in full - open it, copy it, change the bracketed parts.
Engagement LetterAgreementStandardDraft / Generate
Draft an engagement letter for [Law Firm] to represent [Client] in [describe matter]. Include scope of representation, fee structure, billing practices, staffing, conflicts check confirmation, termination rights, and file retention policy.
Matter Budget TemplateChecklistStandardOperations
Create a matter budget template for [type of legal matter] including phase/task breakdowns, estimated hours by timekeeper level, expenses, contingency allowance, and assumptions. Align with [LEDES/UTBMS] billing codes.
Outside Counsel GuidelinesPolicyAdvancedDraft / Generate
Draft outside counsel guidelines for [Company's] legal department covering billing requirements, rate structures, staffing expectations, invoice submission procedures, e-billing requirements, diversity requirements, and performance metrics.
Legal Department Annual ReportReportAdvancedSummarize / Extract
Draft an annual report template for [Company's] legal department covering matter statistics, spend analysis, significant matters, risk management activities, operational improvements, diversity metrics, and strategic priorities for the coming year.
Contract PlaybookPlaybookAdvancedDraft / Generate
Create a contract playbook for [type of agreement] at [Company] covering standard positions, fallback positions, red lines, approval requirements, and negotiation guidance for key clauses including [list 5-7 key clauses].
Legal Technology RFPMemoAdvancedDraft / Generate
Draft a request for proposal (RFP) for [Company] seeking a [contract management/e-billing/matter management/other] solution. Include functional requirements, technical requirements, integration needs, security standards, evaluation criteria, and pricing structure.
Client Intake FormChecklistStarterOperations
Create a client intake form for [Law Firm/Legal Department] to capture essential information for new matters including client details, matter description, conflict check information, document collection, urgency assessment, and initial budget estimate.
Legal Invoice Review ChecklistChecklistStandardReview / Redline
Create an invoice review checklist for [Company] legal department to review outside counsel invoices. Include rate compliance, task code accuracy, block billing violations, excessive charges, guideline compliance, and approval workflow steps.
Matter Closing ProcedureChecklistStandardOperations
Draft a matter closing procedure for [Law Firm/Legal Department] covering final billing, client communication, file organization, document retention, conflict system updates, lessons learned capture, and archiving requirements.
Legal Hold Management ProcedurePolicyAdvancedOperations
Draft a legal hold management procedure for [Company] covering hold initiation triggers, custodian identification, notice issuance, acknowledgment tracking, hold release process, and documentation requirements for defensibility.
Legal Department KPI DashboardReportStandardOperations
Design a KPI dashboard framework for [Company's] legal department tracking matter volume, cycle times, spend against budget, outside counsel utilization, contract turnaround times, and client satisfaction scores.
Alternative Fee Arrangement TemplateAgreementAdvancedDraft / Generate
Draft an alternative fee arrangement proposal for [type of legal matter] between [Client] and [Law Firm]. Cover fee structure options (fixed fee, capped fee, success fee, blended rate), scope definition, change management, and performance metrics.
Legal Budget ForecastReportAdvancedOperations
Create a quarterly legal budget forecast template for [department/firm]. Include categories for external counsel fees, litigation costs, compliance expenditure, technology/tools, staffing, and contingency. Add variance tracking columns and year-over-year comparison.
Records Retention SchedulePolicyAdvancedOperations
Draft a records retention schedule for [Company]'s legal and business documents by category: contracts, HR files, financial records, corporate governance records, litigation files, and tax records. For each category, give a proposed retention period, the trigger event that starts the clock, and the regulatory basis — but mark every regulatory citation as [VERIFY CITATION] rather than presenting it as settled. Add a legal-hold override: any document under a litigation hold is retained until the hold is released, regardless of the schedule. Close with a disposal method (secure destruction or archive) per category.
Regulatory Compliance CalendarChecklistAdvancedCompliance / Due Diligence
Build a compliance calendar for [Company] covering recurring filings, renewals, and reporting deadlines under [list regulations or licenses]. For each item, show the trigger, how far in advance to start preparing, the internal owner, and the consequence of missing it. Flag any deadline you are not fully certain about as [CONFIRM DATE WITH REGULATOR/COUNSEL] instead of guessing a date.
Outside Counsel Instruction LetterMemoStandardDraft / Generate
Draft an instruction letter from [Company]'s legal department to [Law Firm] opening a specific matter: [describe the matter]. Include the scope of work authorized, the budget cap and when to seek approval before exceeding it, the required reporting cadence, who at the company has sign-off authority, staffing expectations (no unapproved partner-level work without prior consent), and a reminder that all communications remain privileged and should not be forwarded outside the approved distribution list.
Subpoena and Third-Party Records Request ChecklistChecklistAdvancedCompliance / Due Diligence
Build a response checklist for when [Company] receives a subpoena or third-party records request in [jurisdiction]. Cover: confirming the deadline to respond or object, who internally needs to be notified immediately, whether the request calls for privileged or confidential material, the process for a privilege log if documents are withheld, notifying affected employees or customers if required, and the objection grounds available if the request is overbroad. Mark every jurisdiction-specific deadline or procedural rule as [CONFIRM WITH LOCAL COUNSEL] instead of assuming a default rule applies.
Pre-Send Self-Audit Before the Draft Leaves the OfficeChecklistExpertReview / Redline
Act as the last reviewer before this document leaves the firm. Scope: the draft below, intended for [RECIPIENT], for the purpose of [PURPOSE], under the retainer described as [SCOPE OF ENGAGEMENT], due [DATE]. Audit it as though you will personally answer for anything that goes wrong. Return: (1) Blocking Defects — anything that must be fixed before it goes out, each with the exact location in the draft and the corrected wording; (2) Client-Facing Errors — wrong names, dates, amounts or entity forms, unfilled placeholders and square brackets, comments or tracked changes left in, and any text carried over from another matter or client; (3) Internal Consistency — defined terms used before they are defined or never used at all, cross-references pointing at the wrong clause, broken numbering, and figures that differ between the body, the schedules and the cover email; (4) Scope and Instruction Fit — where the draft goes beyond what was asked or fails to answer what was asked, mapped against [SCOPE OF ENGAGEMENT]; (5) Unstated Assumptions — assumptions the document relies on but does not disclose, with the sentence that would disclose each one; (6) Tone and Exposure — anything that overpromises, guarantees an outcome, gives advice outside the retainer, or reads as a conclusion where it should read as an option; (7) Confidentiality Check — third-party names, privileged or without-prejudice material, and document metadata to strip before sending; (8) Ship Decision — Send, Send after the numbered fixes above, or Do Not Send, in one line with the reason. Draft: [PASTE].
Fabrication Check on an AI-Assisted DraftChecklistAdvancedReview / Redline
Act as a verification reviewer for a document that was drafted with AI assistance. Scope: the draft below and the source materials I supply — treat those sources as the only permissible basis for any factual, numerical or legal statement in the draft. Do not fill gaps from your own knowledge; an unsupported statement is a finding, not something for you to justify. Return: (1) Source Map — every factual and legal assertion in the draft, matched to the source and line that supports it; (2) Unsourced Assertions — statements with no support anywhere in the materials, quoted verbatim with their location in the draft; (3) Suspected Fabrications — citations, case names, quotes, figures, dates, party names or document references that appear nowhere in the sources, listed verbatim and flagged as high priority; (4) Quote Integrity — every quotation checked word for word against the source, with any drift shown side by side; (5) Number Integrity — every figure, date, deadline, percentage and calculation traced to its source, with a note where the arithmetic does not reconcile; (6) Silent Drift — passages where the draft states a source more strongly, more broadly or more favourably than the source states itself; (7) Verification Queue — what a human must check manually, ordered by damage if wrong, with the specific check for each item; (8) Verdict — the count of unsourced and suspected-fabricated items and whether the draft may be circulated as it stands. Sources: [PASTE]. Draft: [PASTE].
Notarisation, Legalisation and Apostille ChainChecklistAdvancedCompliance / Due Diligence
Act as the lawyer responsible for getting documents accepted abroad. The file is [TRANSACTION OR MATTER]. Documents to move: [LIST, with who issued each and where]. Country of origin: [COUNTRY A]. Country where they must be accepted: [COUNTRY B]. Receiving body: [COURT / COMPANY REGISTRY / LAND REGISTRY / BANK / IMMIGRATION AUTHORITY / NOTARY]. Work out the authentication chain end to end. The chain depends on whether both countries are parties to the Hague Apostille Convention — several states in the region are and several are not, and the difference is a single stamp versus a multi-step consular route that can add weeks. Confirm the current status of both countries against an official source rather than assuming it, and say plainly where you have not confirmed it. Return: (1) Route Decision — apostille route or consular legalisation route, with the source you checked for each country's status and the date you checked it; (2) Step Table — for each document, the ordered steps (notary, chamber of commerce, issuing ministry, foreign ministry, embassy or consulate, receiving-country foreign ministry), with the body, the fee if known, and the realistic turnaround; (3) Translation Point — at which step the translation must be made, whether it must be done by a translator licensed in the destination country, and whether the translation itself is authenticated; (4) Form Traps — originals versus certified copies, documents that expire, signature and seal requirements, documents that a notary will not certify, and language of the underlying document; (5) Corporate Documents — the extra layer for board resolutions, powers of attorney and certificates of incorporation, including who must appear and what proof of authority the notary will demand; (6) Critical Path — the sequence laid on a calendar working backwards from [DEADLINE], showing which steps can run in parallel and which cannot; (7) Failure Modes — the three most common reasons the receiving body rejects a pack, and the check that catches each before submission; (8) Confirmation Questions — the short list to put to the receiving body and to local counsel before starting, because a rejected chain has to be run again from the beginning. Confirm every step with the receiving authority; this is a planning aid, not legal advice.