Prompts
Prompts de IA jurídica para Corporate / Commercial
49 prompts you can paste straight into HAQQ or any other assistant. Every one is written out in full. Open it, copy it, change the bracketed parts.
Draft Me an NDA: Ask Me the Questions FirstAgreementStarterDraft / Generate
I act for [the disclosing party / the receiving party / both parties, if the NDA is mutual]. Draft me an NDA. Before you write a word, ask me the questions that change the document, and wait for my answers. At a minimum ask: who is disclosing and is it one-way or mutual; the governing law and the courts; the purpose the information may be used for; how long confidentiality lasts after the term ends; whether trade secrets get a longer or indefinite tail; the permitted recipients; whether residual knowledge is carved out; return or destruction of materials; and whether injunctive relief is available in that jurisdiction without proving loss. Ask them as a numbered list in one message. Then draft. After the draft, give me three things: the two clauses most likely to be negotiated and my fallback on each; any clause that would not be enforceable in the jurisdiction I named, flagged for confirmation rather than stated as settled; and a one-line note on whether a mutual NDA actually serves me here or whether I am giving away protection I did not need to. Do not produce a generic template with no questions asked. That is the version I can already get anywhere.
Red-Flag Review and Score From One Side's PositionReportAdvancedReview / Redline
Analyse the attached document. I act for [party], and the governing law is [jurisdiction]. Return, in this order: 1. A table of red flags. Columns: clause reference, the risk in one line, severity (high / medium / low), and the specific words that create it. Sort by severity. 2. What is missing that should be there. Judge the document against what a competent lawyer would expect for this type of agreement in this jurisdiction, not against a generic checklist. 3. Strengths: the clauses that already work in my client's favour, so I do not trade them away. 4. A score out of 10 from my client's perspective, with the reason for the score in two lines. Then say what the score would be from the counterparty's perspective, because a document that scores 9 for both sides is usually a document nobody has read properly. 5. The three fixes that move the score most, each written as replacement wording I can paste in. Mandatory rules: quote the actual clause text you are relying on. Never paraphrase a clause and then critique your own paraphrase. If a risk depends on a fact outside the document, say which fact. If the document is incomplete or a page is unreadable, say so before analysing. Where you rely on a rule of law or a figure the document itself does not supply, flag it for confirmation rather than stating it as settled.
Enforceability of a Liability Cap Under UAE LawMemoExpertResearch / Authorities
I act for [the party relying on the cap / the party resisting it]. The attached contract caps liability at [amount / a multiple of fees] and excludes [consequential loss / loss of profit / gross negligence]. Governing law is UAE law, forum [onshore courts / DIFC / ADGM / arbitration]. Advise: 1. Is the cap enforceable as drafted before the stated forum, and on what statutory basis. 2. Which carve-outs are mandatory and cannot be excluded whatever the parties agreed: address fraud, gross negligence, wilful misconduct, death and personal injury, and any decennial or statutory liability that applies. 3. How an onshore court's treatment differs from DIFC or ADGM on the same wording. 4. Whether the cap survives if the contract is terminated or found void. 5. Redraft the clause so it holds up, and mark each change with the reason. Mandatory rules: cite the Civil Transactions Law or Commercial Transactions Law article for every proposition. Where onshore and the financial free zones diverge, set them out side by side rather than blending them. Do not cite a judgment you cannot name, and flag any point that turns on a case you cannot verify rather than asserting it as settled.
Standard NDAAgreementStandardDraft / Generate
You are drafting a mutual non-disclosure agreement between [Party A] and [Party B], entered into so both sides can evaluate a potential [describe transaction or project]. Cover confidentiality obligations owed by each party, carve-outs for information that is already public or independently developed, permitted disclosures to advisors and regulators, a term of [X] years, and governing law of [jurisdiction]. Return a complete agreement in numbered clauses ready for review. Do not state that a clause is enforceable in [jurisdiction] unless you can point to the specific rule; flag it for local counsel instead.
Amend a Template to Favour One PartyAgreementAdvancedReview / Redline
I act for [the disclosing party / the buyer / the landlord / the party I name]. Make the necessary amendments so the attached template works in their favour. Governing law is [jurisdiction]. Return: 1. A redline in table form: clause, current wording, proposed wording, and the reason in one line. Do not rewrite the whole document. Change only what needs to change, and say so where a clause is already fine. 2. New clauses to insert, with the position in the document where each belongs. 3. Clauses to delete, with what my client gives up by deleting them, because a one-sided document that the counterparty refuses to sign is not a win. 4. A short negotiation note: which of these amendments the other side will accept without argument, which they will resist, and a fallback for each of the contested ones. 5. Anything I am asking for that would be unenforceable in this jurisdiction however it is drafted. Tell me now rather than after signature. Mandatory rules: quote the current wording exactly as it appears. Keep the document's existing defined terms and numbering rather than introducing your own. Where you say a clause would be unenforceable, name the rule that makes it so; if you are not certain, flag it for confirmation rather than asserting it.
Full Contract Risk ReviewReportAdvancedReview / Redline
I act for [COMPANY NAME]. Review the following contract: [PASTE CONTRACT TEXT OR ATTACH FILE]. Identify legal risks, unclear clauses, missing protections, and terms that may expose [COMPANY NAME] to financial or legal liability. Provide a structured report with these sections: - High risk clauses - Unclear or ambiguous language - Missing protections for [COMPANY NAME] - Clauses that strongly favor the other party - Suggested revisions in plain English Mandatory rule: quote the exact clause wording behind every risk you flag. Where a risk turns on a rule of law the contract does not state, say so rather than assuming how it would resolve. End with a short summary of the top risks.
Memorandum of UnderstandingAgreementStandardDraft / Generate
I act for [Party A / Party B]. Draft a memorandum of understanding between [Party A] and [Party B] regarding their intention to [describe collaboration or project]. Clearly distinguish binding and non-binding provisions, and cover responsibilities, timeline, and the path to a definitive agreement. Output: a single MOU document, ready to circulate for comment. Mandatory rule: mark every clause as binding or non-binding rather than leaving its status to be inferred, and flag any provision whose enforceability you are not certain of rather than drafting it as settled.
Distribution AgreementAgreementStandardDraft / Generate
You are drafting a distribution agreement appointing [Distributor] as the [exclusive/non-exclusive] distributor of [products] in [territory]. Cover minimum purchase commitments, pricing and discount terms, marketing and promotional obligations, intellectual property licensing and protection, term, and termination rights including notice periods. Return a complete agreement in numbered clauses. Where a competition law or agency law limit on exclusivity or termination may apply, flag it for confirmation rather than asserting a specific rule. Cite the statute or case authority behind any competition law or agency law limitation named in the flag, rather than describing that limitation in general terms.
Service AgreementAgreementStandardDraft / Generate
I act for [Service Provider / Client]. Draft a services agreement where [Service Provider] will provide [describe services] to [Client]. Include scope of work, deliverables, payment terms of [amount/schedule], term of [duration], termination provisions, limitation of liability, and governing law of [jurisdiction]. Output: a single services agreement ready to send for signature. Mandatory rule: flag any limitation of liability or termination wording that may not be enforceable under the governing law named above, rather than drafting it as settled. Cite the specific statute or case authority behind any liability cap or termination right you describe as required under the governing law named above, rather than stating it as common practice.
Registered Commercial Agency Termination ExposureMemoExpertStrategy / Scenario
I act for the [principal / agent] under a commercial agency in the UAE. Registration status [registered with the Ministry of Economy / unregistered], term [fixed until date / indefinite], exclusivity [exclusive / non-exclusive], and the principal wants to [terminate / not renew / appoint a second distributor]. Advise: 1. What registration changes legally: the protections it confers and what falls away without it. 2. The grounds on which the relationship can lawfully be ended, and whether a contractual termination right is enough on its own. 3. The compensation exposure: the heads of claim available to the agent, how each is quantified, and what evidence supports or defeats them. 4. The forum: the agency committee, the courts, or arbitration, and whether an arbitration clause is effective against the statutory regime. 5. A sequenced plan for the principal that minimises exposure, with the point of no return marked. Mandatory rules: cite the Commercial Agencies Law article for every proposition, and do not cite one you cannot verify. Flag that the law was amended, and say what turns on which version applies and how to check. Do not treat an unregistered agency as if it were registered.
Marketing Services Agreement for the Client SideAgreementAdvancedDraft / Generate
Draft a social-media marketing services agreement under UAE law. I act for the client, not the agency. Commercials: scope [describe the services], term [period], fees [amount and payment schedule], channels [list]. The agreement must protect the client on: 1. Ownership of everything produced (creative, footage, ad accounts, pixels, follower lists and any handle created for the campaign) assigned or transferred on payment, not licensed. 2. Approval gates before anything is published, and liability if the agency publishes without approval. 3. Compliance with UAE advertising, media and influencer-disclosure requirements, with the agency bearing the fines it causes. 4. Data protection and confidentiality, including what happens to audience data at the end. 5. Termination for convenience with a short notice period, and an exit that hands back every credential and asset within a fixed number of days. 6. Performance reporting on a defined cadence, and a remedy that is not just 'we will try again'. Put every commercial number in square brackets. Mandatory rule: where a clause asserts that something satisfies a UAE advertising, media or data-protection requirement, name the specific requirement; if you are not certain it is fully met, flag it for legal sign-off rather than drafting it as compliant. After the draft, list the three clauses an agency will push back on hardest and give me a fallback position for each.
Exclusive Agency Protected Against Future CompetitionAgreementAdvancedDraft / Generate
Prepare an exclusive agency agreement for Oman. I act for the agent, and the priority is the clauses that protect my client from future competition. Facts: products [products], territory [territory], term [term], minimum purchase commitment [amount]. The agreement must deal with: 1. A precise definition of exclusivity: does it cover direct sales by the principal, online sales, and spillover sales from a neighbouring territory. 2. The principal's undertaking not to appoint a second agent or sell direct, and the agreed remedy for breach. 3. What registration with the competent authority does to enforceability, and what is lost if the agency is not registered. 4. Renewal, protection against abrupt termination, the notice required, and compensation. 5. The fate of stock, customers and trade marks on expiry. 6. Dispute resolution and forum, flagging how far an arbitration clause holds up against mandatory provisions. Put every commercial figure in square brackets. List every clause that may not be enforceable because it conflicts with a mandatory rule, naming the rule; where you are not certain a mandatory rule applies, flag it rather than letting the clause pass silently.
Recent KSA Legal Developments for an InvestorReportExpertResearch / Authorities
I advise an investment company [describe its activity and holdings]. Summarise, in bullet form, the recent developments in the Saudi legal landscape that matter to it over the next [number] months. Cover: the companies regime, foreign investment and licensing, capital markets and fund formation, civil transactions and contract law, labour and Saudisation, data protection, tax and zakat, and dispute resolution. For every item give exactly four things: 1. What changed, in one line. 2. The instrument (law, decree, implementing regulation or circular) with its number and date. 3. The date it takes effect, and any transitional period. 4. What this specific investor has to do about it, and by when. If the answer is 'nothing', say so. Then close with a short list of changes that are announced but not yet in force, so I can plan for them. Mandatory rules: do not include an item you cannot tie to a named instrument. Say plainly where your information may be out of date and what should be verified against the official gazette before I rely on it.
Hotel Development Partnership: Land Against Build-and-OperateAgreementExpertDraft / Generate
Draft a hotel development partnership agreement under Iraqi law. I act for the [first party / second party]. Facts: the first party [name] contributes the land and the investment licence; the second party [name] builds at its own cost and operates the hotel. Profit split [percentage], term [term], location [location]. The agreement must deal with: 1. Characterising the relationship precisely (company, partnership, usufruct, or construction contract) and the effect of that characterisation on ownership, tax and registration, with a reasoned choice. 2. Ownership of the land and ownership of the building once constructed, and what happens to the building at the end of the term or on termination. 3. The investment licence: in whose name it stays, and the effect on the contract if it is transferred or withdrawn. 4. The split mechanism: on revenue or on net profit, with an accounting definition that leaves no room for argument, plus an audit right. 5. Distress: what happens if construction stops, overruns its budget, or operation fails, with cure and exit mechanisms. 6. Dispute resolution, registration with the competent authorities, and applicable law. Put every figure in square brackets. Mandatory rules: cite the provision of Iraqi law behind the characterisation you choose and behind any registration requirement. Where a mechanism depends on a licence condition or a registration practice you cannot verify, flag it for confirmation with the competent authority rather than stating it as settled. Then name three risks specific to this structure in Iraq, and how the contract addresses each.
Translate, Summarise and Give the BackgroundMemoStandardSummarize / Extract
You are translating and briefing this document for a lawyer who will rely on your summary without re-reading the original line by line. Translate the attached document into [target language] and summarise it, giving me the complete background. Produce four sections: 1. A faithful translation. Keep legal terms of art in the source language in brackets after the translation the first time each appears. A term of art that is translated loosely stops being the same term. 2. A summary in [number] bullet points: what the document is, who the parties are, what it obliges or decides, and the key dates. 3. Background: what kind of document this is in its own legal system, where it sits in a procedure or a transaction, and what usually comes before and after it. 4. What I should notice: anything unusual, any blank or unsigned element, any internal inconsistency, and any figure or date that does not reconcile with the rest of the document. Mandatory rules: do not smooth over an unclear passage. Mark it [unclear in the original] and translate it as literally as you can. Do not add a legal conclusion the document does not contain, and do not state what a clause means under a specific law unless the document itself says which law governs. If handwriting, a stamp or a signature block is illegible, say which part and do not guess at it.
Compare a Rule Across Two JurisdictionsReportExpertResearch / Authorities
I act for [my client's role]. Compare the treatment of [the legal question] under the law of [jurisdiction A] and the law of [jurisdiction B]. Return a comparison table with one row per issue and these columns: the issue, the position in A with its article, the position in B with its article, whether the difference is material in practice, and what it means for a party structuring around it. Then: 1. Name the issues where the two systems reach the same result by different routes. Those are the ones people get wrong. 2. Name the issues where they genuinely diverge, and which is more favourable to [my client's role]. 3. Say what happens if a contract picks A's law but the dispute is heard in B, or the assets are in B. 4. Flag any point that is mandatory in one system and therefore not displaceable by choosing the other's law. Mandatory rules: give the article for each position, and quote the operative words of the provision where the exact wording drives the answer. Where you cannot find the rule in one of the two systems, write 'not found for [jurisdiction]' in that cell rather than filling it by analogy with the other. A comparison table with an invented cell is worse than an incomplete one.
Exclusive Distribution: Targets, Territory and TerminationMemoExpertStrategy / Scenario
A supplier granted a distributor exclusive rights in [territory] for [number] years. The contract requires annual sales targets of [amount], permits termination for failure to meet them, and [describe any other relevant term]. Governing law [jurisdiction]. Advise for [the supplier / the distributor]: 1. Whether missing the target on these facts actually entitles the supplier to terminate, or whether it must first give notice and an opportunity to cure, and whether that is a matter of the contract or of the general law. 2. Whether the target itself is enforceable if market conditions made it unachievable, and what doctrine would be invoked (hardship, good faith, abuse of right, force majeure) with its conditions in this jurisdiction. 3. The distributor's claims on termination: compensation for goodwill or clientele, stock buy-back, notice, and investments made in reliance, and which of these exist by statute rather than by contract. 4. The effect of exclusivity on the analysis, and whether the supplier selling direct or online in the territory has already breached. 5. The forum and the enforcement position if the parties are in different countries. 6. My best three arguments and the other side's best three, then a realistic settlement range. Mandatory rules: cite the article for every statutory right and for the doctrine invoked in point 2. Say clearly which points turn on the contract's exact wording and ask me for that wording rather than assuming it, and mark any point where the answer depends on a court decision you cannot cite with confidence.
Consulting AgreementAgreementStandardDraft / Generate
You are drafting a consulting agreement engaging [Consultant] to provide [describe consulting services] to [Company]. Cover compensation of [rate/structure], expense reimbursement, ownership of intellectual property created under the engagement, confidentiality, a non-compete of [scope/duration], and language confirming independent contractor status. Return a complete agreement in numbered clauses. Do not assert that the non-compete or contractor classification is enforceable in any given jurisdiction; mark that point for local counsel to confirm.
Letter of IntentAgreementStandardDraft / Generate
You are drafting a non-binding letter of intent for a proposed [acquisition/joint venture/partnership] between [Party A] and [Party B]. Set out the key commercial terms: [describe main commercial terms], an exclusivity period of [duration], the due diligence process, and the conditions to signing definitive agreements. State plainly which sections, if any, are intended to be binding. Return a complete letter in numbered sections. Flag any commercial figure you cannot source from the facts given rather than inventing one.
Supply AgreementAgreementStandardDraft / Generate
Draft a supply agreement where [Supplier] will supply [goods/materials] to [Buyer], governed by [jurisdiction] law. I act for the [Supplier / Buyer]. Cover specifications, the pricing mechanism, the ordering process, delivery terms, quality standards, warranties, rejection rights, and force majeure, as clauses in a single agreement ready to issue for signature. Mandatory rule: put every commercial figure and deadline in square brackets rather than assuming one, and flag any protection you rely on that depends on a mandatory rule of [jurisdiction] law you have not confirmed.
Agency AgreementAgreementStandardDraft / Generate
You are drafting a commercial agency agreement appointing [Agent] to [solicit orders for/sell] [products/services] in [territory] on behalf of [Principal]. Cover the commission structure, reporting obligations, exclusivity terms, and the duties this creates under the agency laws of [jurisdiction]. Return a complete agreement in numbered clauses. Do not state a specific agency law entitlement, such as a termination indemnity, unless you can name the provision it comes from; otherwise flag it for local counsel to confirm.
Franchise AgreementAgreementStandardDraft / Generate
You are drafting a franchise agreement granting [Franchisee] the right to operate a [brand name] franchise at [location]. Cover franchise fees, ongoing royalties, training requirements, operational standards, territory restrictions, term, renewal rights, and termination provisions. Return a complete agreement in numbered clauses. Where franchise disclosure or registration rules may apply, flag it for confirmation rather than assuming none exist. Cite the specific franchise disclosure or registration statute flagged for confirmation, or name the regulator responsible for it, rather than referring to franchise law in general terms.
Joint Venture AgreementAgreementStandardDraft / Generate
Draft a joint venture agreement between [Party A] and [Party B] to [describe JV purpose], governed by [jurisdiction] law. I act for [Party A / Party B]. Cover ownership percentages, capital contributions, management structure, profit and loss allocation, exit mechanisms, deadlock resolution, and non-compete obligations, as clauses ready to issue for negotiation. Mandatory rule: put every percentage, contribution and figure in square brackets, and flag any exit or deadlock mechanism whose enforceability under [jurisdiction] law you are not certain of rather than presenting it as settled.
Reseller AgreementAgreementStandardDraft / Generate
You are drafting a reseller agreement authorizing [Reseller] to purchase and resell [products] from [Vendor]. Cover pricing discounts, minimum order quantities, marketing requirements, trademark usage rights, warranty pass-through terms, and territory restrictions. Return a complete agreement in numbered clauses. Flag any figure, quota, or deadline you cannot source from the facts given, so it can be confirmed before the agreement is finalized.
Master Services AgreementAgreementStandardDraft / Generate
You are drafting a master services agreement establishing the framework for [Provider] to deliver ongoing [services] to [Client] under individual statements of work. Cover the change order process, service level terms, liability caps, insurance requirements, and audit rights. Return a complete agreement in numbered clauses. Do not state a liability figure or service level threshold that is not given in the facts; leave it as a placeholder for the parties to fill in. Cite the provision behind any statutory or regulatory requirement you rely on, and flag anything you cannot attribute to a named source for the parties' counsel to confirm.
Vendor Agreement Red Flag ScanReportAdvancedReview / Redline
Act as counsel for [COMPANY NAME]. Analyze this vendor agreement: [PASTE AGREEMENT]. Focus on payment terms, liability limits, termination conditions, intellectual property ownership, and service obligations. Explain, ranked from highest to lowest financial exposure: - Clauses that may create financial exposure - Terms that restrict flexibility or exit options - Any unusual or one-sided conditions Then rewrite the risky clauses with safer alternatives suitable for [COMPANY NAME], adding one line on why each alternative is safer. Quote the actual clause text before you rewrite it, and flag any exposure that depends on a fact outside the document rather than assuming the worst case. Cite the provision or standard behind any legal exposure you assert, and mark anything you cannot attribute to a named source for counsel to confirm.
NDA Strength CheckReportStandardReview / Redline
Act as counsel for [COMPANY NAME]. Evaluate this Non Disclosure Agreement: [PASTE NDA]. Check whether the agreement properly protects confidential information for [COMPANY NAME]. Review the following areas: - Definition of confidential information - Duration of confidentiality obligations - Permitted disclosures - Remedies for breach Identify weaknesses and rewrite the NDA clauses so the protection is stronger and clearer. Quote the actual clause language you are critiquing rather than paraphrasing it, and flag any weakness that depends on a fact outside the document for confirmation.
Contract Negotiation PreparationPlaybookExpertStrategy / Scenario
Act as counsel for [COMPANY NAME]. Analyze this contract before negotiation: [PASTE CONTRACT]. Create a negotiation brief for [COMPANY NAME]. Include: - Clauses that should be renegotiated, ranked by priority, and why - Clauses that should not be changed - Suggested alternative wording for key provisions - Questions to ask the other party, ordered so the least contentious comes first Present the output as a clear negotiation checklist. Quote the actual clause text before proposing alternative wording, and flag any renegotiation point that depends on a commercial fact about [COMPANY NAME] you have not been given rather than assuming its priorities.
Contract Summary for ExecutivesMemoStandardSummarize / Extract
Act as the lawyer preparing this summary for a busy executive. Summarize the following contract: [PASTE CONTRACT]. Create a one page briefing with these sections: - Purpose of the agreement - Key obligations for each party - Financial commitments - Legal risks - Termination conditions Write the summary in simple language so a non lawyer can understand the agreement in under three minutes. Attribute every obligation, figure, and termination trigger to the actual clause it comes from, and flag anything the contract leaves ambiguous rather than resolving it for the reader.
Complex Law → Simple SummaryMemoStandardSummarize / Extract
Act as counsel preparing a client-facing summary. Summarize the following legal or tax provision in simple language: [PASTE PROVISION]. Include: the key points, the compliance requirements it creates, and the practical implications for the client. Deliver a short client-ready note, one paragraph per item above. Quote the actual provision text behind each point rather than paraphrasing it, and flag anything in the provision that is ambiguous or that you cannot verify against the source text.
Client Advisory NoteMemoAdvancedClient Communications
You act for a client considering [transaction] and need a client advisory note under [jurisdiction] law. Facts: the nature and value of [transaction], the parties involved (describe), and the timeline the client is working to (describe). Draft the note covering: 1. Executive summary: the transaction in plain terms and the client's exposure in two or three lines. 2. Tax implications: the taxes that apply, who bears them, and any elections or reliefs available. 3. Compliance requirements: filings, approvals or registrations the transaction triggers, and their deadlines. 4. Risks: the three risks most likely to affect the client, ranked by likelihood and impact. 5. Recommended next steps: what the client should do before proceeding, in order. Mandatory rules: state a tax rate, filing deadline or compliance threshold only where it can be attributed to a named statute, regulation or official guidance, otherwise flag it as needing confirmation from a tax specialist. Close the note with a line stating it is general guidance for the client's consideration, not a substitute for a formal opinion.
Agreement / Legal Draft ReviewReportAdvancedReview / Redline
Review the agreement at [paste agreement text] for [party]'s position under [jurisdiction] law. Facts: the type of agreement (describe, for example supply, services or licensing), and the stage of negotiation (first draft, counterparty markup, or final review). Deliverables: 1. A table of legal risks: clause reference, the risk in one line, and severity (high / medium / low). 2. Tax implications: any provisions that create a tax event, withholding obligation or reporting requirement. 3. Compliance issues: clauses that conflict with applicable regulation, sector rules or the client's existing obligations. 4. Missing protections: what a competent lawyer would expect in this type of agreement that is absent here. 5. Proposed redlines for the three issues that carry the most risk, written as replacement wording. Mandatory rules: quote the actual clause text you are relying on before analysing it, do not paraphrase a clause and then critique the paraphrase. Do not state a tax or compliance consequence unless it is tied to a specific provision of law you cite, otherwise flag it for confirmation.
Convert Law Into ChecklistChecklistStandardCompliance / Due Diligence
Convert the legal provision at [paste provision text] into a practical compliance checklist for [role, for example in house counsel or compliance officer] operating under [jurisdiction]. Produce a numbered checklist where each item is one concrete obligation drawn from the provision, stating who must act, what must be done, and any deadline. Mandatory rules: include only obligations that appear in the quoted text, do not infer a requirement the provision does not state, and flag any term in the provision that is ambiguous rather than resolving it yourself.
Professional Email DraftMemoStarterClient Communications
Draft a professional email to [client name] explaining [the issue], the legal position under [jurisdiction] law, and the recommended course of action, from [your name/firm]. Keep the email to a length a client can read in one sitting, and close with the next step you need from them and the date you need it by. Mandatory rules: state the legal position only to the extent it is supported by facts and authority already confirmed, and flag anything uncertain as needing further review rather than presenting it as settled.
Convert Complex Document into Key PointsReportStandardSummarize / Extract
Act as counsel reviewing this document for a client. Analyze the following document: [PASTE DOCUMENT]. Extract the key legal issues, the risks, and the important points, in bullet format grouped under those three headings. Quote the specific clause or passage behind each issue you raise, and flag anything you cannot verify from the text itself rather than inferring it.
Social Media / Knowledge Content PromptMemoStarterClient Communications
Write a LinkedIn/Twitter thread explaining [legal or tax topic] in plain language for a non lawyer audience, using [number] posts and at least one worked example. State the jurisdiction the explanation applies to as [jurisdiction], since the rule may differ elsewhere. Mandatory rules: do not state a rule, rate or deadline as general truth unless it holds across [jurisdiction] without exception, where it varies say so instead of oversimplifying. The thread is educational content, not legal advice for the reader's specific situation. Cite the specific statute, tax code section, or official guidance behind any rule, rate, or deadline stated in the thread, and mark anything you cannot trace to a named source as illustrative rather than exact.
Regulatory Change Impact AssessmentReportExpertCompliance / Due Diligence
Act as compliance counsel assessing the impact of [new regulation/amendment] on [company/industry]. Facts: the effective date of [new regulation/amendment] [date], and the jurisdiction it applies in [jurisdiction]. Deliverables: 1. The operations of [company/industry] affected by [new regulation/amendment], named specifically rather than generically. 2. The compliance gaps between current practice and what [new regulation/amendment] requires. 3. The policy changes required to close each gap. 4. An implementation timeline anchored to the effective date. 5. Risk mitigation strategies for any gap that cannot be closed before the effective date. Mandatory rules: cite the specific provision of [new regulation/amendment] behind each requirement you identify. Flag any requirement you cannot attribute to a named provision rather than inferring it from the regulation's general purpose.
SaaS Terms of ServiceAgreementAdvancedDraft / Generate
Act as counsel for the SaaS provider, governed by the law of [jurisdiction]. Draft terms of service for a platform offering [describe service], covering: 1. Account terms: who may register and account responsibilities. 2. Acceptable use policy: prohibited conduct. 3. Service level commitments: uptime and support standards. 4. Data ownership: who owns customer data and outputs. 5. Subscription and billing terms: pricing, renewal, and cancellation. 6. Limitation of liability. 7. Dispute resolution: forum and process. 8. Termination provisions: grounds and effect. Mandatory rules: do not state a liability cap, warranty disclaimer, or consumer-protection carve-out as enforceable under [jurisdiction] law without flagging it for local counsel to confirm; mark any clause that may need a jurisdiction-specific mandatory term as unresolved rather than settled.
Contract Risk MatrixReportAdvancedReview / Redline
Act for the reviewing party, under [jurisdiction] law. Analyze the attached contract and create a risk matrix categorizing each clause by risk level (low/medium/high/critical). For each risk, provide: 1. The clause reference. 2. The risk in one line. 3. Potential impact. 4. Likelihood. 5. A recommended mitigation action, written as wording I can propose. Mandatory rules: quote the actual clause text behind each risk, never paraphrase a clause and then assess your own paraphrase. If a risk depends on a fact outside the document, say which fact, and do not assume a statutory protection applies unless the clause or a named source confirms it.
Vendor Risk Assessment QuestionnaireChecklistStandardCompliance / Due Diligence
Create a vendor risk assessment questionnaire for evaluating [vendor name] before onboarding for [type of engagement]. Cover data security practices, compliance certifications, business continuity planning, subcontractor management, insurance coverage, financial stability, and incident notification procedures, framed as questions the vendor must answer with supporting evidence. Mandatory rules: do not assert that a vendor meets a standard or certification requirement, frame every item as a question requiring the vendor's own documentation, and flag any answer that cannot be verified against a certificate or policy document.
Escalation Memo to Business LeadershipMemoAdvancedStrategy / Scenario
Act as in-house counsel. Write a one-page escalation memo from legal to [executive or committee] flagging a risk in [describe the deal, contract, or situation] that needs a business decision, not just a legal opinion. State the risk in plain language, what happens if leadership does nothing, two or three realistic options with the trade-off of each, legal's recommendation, and the deadline for a decision. Do not state the risk's likelihood, exposure amount or legal basis as certain unless it is grounded in what I told you; mark anything else [CONFIRM] rather than presenting it as settled. Keep it under 400 words and free of jargon a non-lawyer would have to look up.
Five-Pass Contract Review for In-House CounselReportExpertReview / Redline
Act as in-house counsel for [Company]. Review the attached contract in five passes, labeling each section of your output by pass number. Pass 1: summarize the deal, the parties, the term, and every date or deadline in the document. Pass 2: go clause by clause and list each party's obligations, quoting the clause text for each one rather than paraphrasing it. Pass 3: rate each risk you find as low/medium/high/critical, with the clause reference and a proposed redline. Pass 4: check the contract against [attached playbook, or 'our standard positions below'] and flag every deviation. Pass 5: close with a one-paragraph executive summary and a go/no-go recommendation. Contract: [PASTE]. Playbook or standard positions: [PASTE OR DESCRIBE]. Mandatory rules: quote the actual clause text you rely on, never paraphrase a clause and then critique your own paraphrase. Do not describe a position as market standard, or cite a statute or regulation, that you cannot attribute to a named source; flag it as needing confirmation instead.
Negotiation Position and Fallback LadderPlaybookExpertStrategy / Scenario
Act as lead negotiator for [OUR SIDE] on [DEAL OR DISPUTE]. Scope: the open terms listed here and nothing else: [LIST OPEN TERMS]. Counterparty: [NAME AND TYPE]. Work only from the facts and documents I provide; where a fact is missing, list it as an assumption rather than inventing it. Return: (1) Our Position: the opening ask on each open term, written in the words we would put in writing; (2) Fallback Ladder, for each term, three graded retreat positions (Ideal / Acceptable / Last Resort) and the trigger that moves us down a rung; (3) Red Lines, the terms we do not trade, with why each is structural rather than a preference; (4) Trade Currency, what we can give that costs us little and is worth much to them, paired term by term; (5) Their Likely Position: the counterparty's probable opening, their own red lines, and the pressure they are under; (6) Concession Sequence, the order in which we release ground and what we demand in exchange for each move; (7) Deadlock Breakers, three mechanisms (staged pricing, sunset, escalation to principals, third-party determination) to unlock a stuck term; (8) Walk-Away, the point at which no deal beats this deal, stated as a condition we can actually test. Mark every figure or deadline you cannot trace to what I gave you as [CONFIRM] rather than treating it as settled. Keep every entry in language a partner could read aloud in the room.
Four-Column Negotiation Table for a Counterparty MarkupReportExpertStrategy / Scenario
Act as deal counsel for [OUR SIDE] responding to the counterparty's markup of [AGREEMENT]. Scope is the attached redline only. Do not reopen terms the counterparty accepted, and do not invent facts about the commercial deal that are not in the document or in [DEAL BACKGROUND]. Return: (1) Negotiation Table: one row per contested clause with exactly four columns: Clause and Current Text | What They Are Asking For | What We Can Live With | Our Response Line (the sentence we actually send back); (2) Classification, mark each row Market Standard, Aggressive, or Deal-Breaking, with a one-line reason grounded in the drafting rather than in a market claim; (3) Cost of Conceding, for each row, the concrete exposure we take on if we simply accept, in operational terms; (4) Linked Terms, which rows must move together (indemnity with liability cap, termination with transition assistance, IP with licence scope) so we do not concede one and lose the pair; (5) Authority Needed: which rows the deal lead can settle alone and which need sign-off from [APPROVER], with the reason for escalation; (6) Package Offers, two bundles we would accept whole, each framed as a single trade rather than a list; (7) Open Questions, what we must ask them before responding, phrased as we would send it; (8) Client Summary, one paragraph a non-lawyer can act on. Mark every exposure figure or deadline you cannot trace to the redline or to [DEAL BACKGROUND] as [CONFIRM] rather than presenting it as fact. Redline: [PASTE].
Bilingual English–Arabic Contract with Governing Language ClauseAgreementExpertDraft / Generate
Act as drafting counsel producing a bilingual English-Arabic [CONTRACT TYPE] between [PARTY A, jurisdiction] and [PARTY B, jurisdiction], to be performed in [COUNTRY] with governing law [GOVERNING LAW]. Commercial terms: [KEY TERMS]. Do not state a local-law rule you cannot attribute to a named instrument. Mark it To Be Confirmed instead. Return: (1) Bilingual Body: the full text in two columns, English left and Arabic right, with clause numbering aligned so each Arabic clause sits beside its English counterpart; (2) Governing Language Clause, a drafted clause stating which version prevails in the event of conflict, plus a note on how that choice is likely to be treated by the courts of [COUNTRY] and what happens in practice where the local court conducts proceedings in Arabic, citing the provision or rule you rely on and flagging it for local counsel; (3) Terminology Table, every defined term with its agreed Arabic equivalent, so the same rendering is used consistently across both versions; (4) Translation Risk Register, clauses where the two languages could be read differently (best efforts, consequential loss, indemnify and hold harmless, without prejudice, time of the essence), each with the drafting fix that closes the gap; (5) Local Form Requirements: signature, corporate seal or stamp, notarisation, legalisation, power of attorney and any filing or registration step to confirm for [COUNTRY]; (6) Mandatory-Law Overrides, terms that local mandatory law may override regardless of the chosen governing law, flagged as questions rather than conclusions; (7) Execution Pack, bilingual signature blocks, list of schedules and annexes, and a version-control note tying the two language versions together; (8) Local Counsel Questions, the short list to send before signing.
Arabic–English Legal Translation QA and Terminology TableReportExpertReview / Redline
Act as a bilingual reviewing lawyer checking a legal translation before it is relied on. Paste the source and the translation, and state the direction [Arabic to English / English to Arabic], the document type [CONTRACT / JUDGMENT / STATUTE / PLEADING / CORPORATE DOCUMENT], and what it will be used for [SIGNATURE / FILING IN COURT / REGULATORY SUBMISSION / CLIENT ADVICE]. Review it as a lawyer, not as a linguist: the question is whether the translated text creates the same legal effect, not whether it reads well. Where a term has no true equivalent across the two systems, say so and give the options rather than picking a comfortable word. Return: (1) Verdict: fit to rely on, fit after the listed fixes, or not fit, in one line with the reason; (2) Meaning-Changing Errors, every place the translation alters an obligation, a right, a deadline, a condition, a party or an amount, quoted in both languages with the corrected rendering; (3) Legal-Effect Divergences, terms of art that do not map cleanly between a common-law source and an Arabic civil-law reader, or the reverse (consideration, trust, estoppel, best efforts, indemnify and hold harmless, without prejudice, وقف التنفيذ, حق الامتياز, التعويض الاتفاقي), each with the options and the one you recommend for this document; (4) Terminology Table, every defined and recurring term, its rendering in both languages, and a note where the translation used more than one rendering for the same term; (5) Numbers, Dates and Names: figures in words and digits, currencies, Hijri and Gregorian dates, party and entity names, transliteration consistency, and anything that must match an official register exactly; (6) Structure and Omissions, clauses, cross-references, schedules, headings or signature blocks that are missing, reordered or silently merged; (7) Formal Requirements, whether the intended use requires a sworn or licensed translator, a stamp, notarisation or legalisation, flagged as a question for the receiving authority; (8) Fix List, a numbered table of every change, ordered by severity, ready to hand to the translator. Do not state that a term is legally equivalent across the two systems unless you show the source and target text side by side; where you are uncertain, mark it [CONFIRM WITH BILINGUAL COUNSEL]. This is a review aid for a qualified practitioner and does not replace a certified translation where one is required.
Power of Attorney for a Cross-Border TransactionAgreementAdvancedDraft / Generate
Act as counsel drafting a power of attorney by which [PRINCIPAL: individual or company, with nationality and place of registration] appoints [ATTORNEY] to act in [COUNTRY] for the purpose of [ACTS TO BE PERFORMED: sign a sale contract, register property, open a bank account, incorporate an entity, represent before a court or authority, collect a debt]. It will be executed in [COUNTRY OF EXECUTION] and used before [RECEIVING BODY]. Two failures account for most rejected powers of attorney: a general grant where the receiving body demands specific authority for the exact act, and a formality gap between where the document was signed and where it must be used. Draft against both. Do not state a local form requirement you cannot attribute to a named source; mark it To Be Confirmed. Return: (1) Power of Attorney: full text, and in bilingual columns where the receiving body works in a different language, with clause numbering aligned across the two versions; (2) Scope of Authority, the specific acts listed one by one in the terms the receiving body will look for, with a note on which of them will be read narrowly and therefore have to be named expressly; (3) Limits and Safeguards, monetary caps, prohibited acts, express treatment of self-dealing and of the attorney acting for both sides, sub-delegation, and whether the attorney may sign anything that binds the principal beyond this transaction; (4) Duration and Revocation, start, expiry, the acts that survive expiry, how revocation is made effective against the receiving body and against a third party who has not been told; (5) Corporate Authority Chain: for a company principal, the board or shareholder resolution behind it, the signatory's own authority, and the corporate documents the notary will demand; (6) Execution and Authentication, notary, witnesses, seal, translation, and the legalisation or apostille chain from [COUNTRY OF EXECUTION] to [COUNTRY], in order with realistic lead times; (7) Rejection Risks, the five things most likely to cause the receiving body to refuse it, each with the drafting or process fix; (8) Confirmation Questions, the short list to put to the receiving body and to local counsel before signing, because a defective power of attorney is usually discovered at the counter. This is a drafting aid for a qualified practitioner, not legal advice.
Registered Commercial Agency: Protection and Termination ExposureMemoExpertCompliance / Due Diligence
Act as counsel advising [PRINCIPAL] on its distribution or agency arrangement with [AGENT OR DISTRIBUTOR] in [COUNTRY], covering [PRODUCTS] since [START DATE]. State whether the arrangement is [registered with the commercial agencies register / unregistered / registration status unknown], and what the principal wants to do: [terminate, decline to renew, appoint a second party, sell direct, or restructure]. In many civil-law and Gulf jurisdictions a registered agency gives the agent statutory protection that a contract cannot bargain away: exclusivity by operation of law, a renewal right, compensation on termination, and in some places the ability to block the principal's goods at the border. Establish the registration position first, because everything else turns on it. Do not state an agency-law rule, a compensation formula or a limitation period you cannot attribute to a named source; mark it To Be Confirmed for local counsel. Return: (1) Registration Position: how to verify whether this arrangement is registered, with whom, in whose name, and what the register entry itself would show; (2) Protection Map, the statutory rights that attach if it is registered, each stated as a question for local counsel with the article you believe grants it, and what changes if it is not registered; (3) Contract Versus Statute, the clauses in the current agreement that would not survive contact with the local statute (termination for convenience, chosen foreign law, foreign forum, waiver of compensation, non-exclusivity), each with what the local rule is likely to do to it; (4) Termination Routes, the grounds actually available, the notice and process for each, and which of them still triggers compensation; (5) Exposure Estimate: the heads of claim the agent could bring, how compensation is typically measured locally, and the inputs the principal must gather to size it, presented as a range with the assumptions marked; (6) Practical Leverage, what the agent can do while a dispute runs (customs block, registration held against a new appointee, refusal to deregister), and how long the principal would be out of the market; (7) Alternative Structures, restructuring to a supply or reseller arrangement, appointing a local entity, or negotiating an exit, with the trade-off and the deregistration step each needs; (8) Action Plan, sequenced steps with owners, the evidence to gather now, and the questions for local counsel before any notice is sent. This is a strategy aid for a qualified local practitioner, not legal advice.
Civil Code Lens on a Contract: Good Faith, Abuse of Right and HardshipMemoExpertResearch / Authorities
Act as counsel re-reading a contract through the civil code of [COUNTRY] rather than through the common-law assumptions it was probably drafted on. Paste the contract or the clauses in issue, and state [WHAT HAS GONE WRONG, WHAT EACH SIDE WANTS TO DO NOW, THE GOVERNING LAW CLAUSE, THE FORUM CLAUSE, AND WHETHER PERFORMANCE IS IN THE SAME COUNTRY AS THE CHOSEN LAW]. Most cross-border agreements in this region are drafted in an English-law style and then performed before a civil-law court that will apply its own mandatory rules whatever the contract says. Your job is to find where the drafting assumes a freedom the code does not give, and where the code gives a party a right the contract never mentioned. Do not state a code article or a settled position you cannot attribute to a named source; mark it To Be Confirmed for local counsel. Return: (1) Assumption Audit: the drafting assumptions that do not travel (entire agreement, no implied terms, termination for convenience, liquidated damages as agreed and unreviewable, sole discretion, waiver by conduct, notice as a strict condition), each with what the local code is likely to do to it; (2) Good Faith, how a duty of good faith in performance and negotiation could change the position here, and the conduct on each side that would be read against it; (3) Abuse of Right, whether exercising a right in the contract (calling a guarantee, terminating, refusing consent, insisting on a technical breach) could be challenged as abusive on these facts, and what evidence that turns on; (4) Hardship and Force Majeure, whether the court can adjust or suspend obligations when performance becomes excessively onerous rather than impossible, how that differs from the contract's own force majeure clause, and which one governs; (5) Damages and Penalties: whether an agreed damages figure can be reduced or increased by the court, whether loss must be proven, and how limitation and exclusion clauses fare; (6) Mandatory Overrides, the rules that apply regardless of the chosen foreign law, and the realistic prospect that the chosen law and forum are respected at all; (7) Redraft Notes, clause by clause, the wording change that makes the intent survive a civil-law reading; (8) Position and Questions, what this means for the client's next move, and the questions for local counsel before acting. This is an analysis aid for a qualified local practitioner, not legal advice.