Prompts
Prompts de IA jurídica para Romania
4 prompts que você pode colar direto no HAQQ ou em qualquer outro assistente. Cada um está escrito por inteiro. Abra, copie e altere as partes entre colchetes.
Romanian Collective Redundancy Compliance ChecklistChecklistExpertEmployment
You are an employment lawyer in Romania reviewing a planned collective redundancy for the board. Produce a concise compliance checklist that tells directors whether the plan can go ahead as scheduled and what must happen first. Use the real Romanian institutions in general terms: the employee representatives or trade union, the territorial labour inspectorate and the territorial employment agency. Facts: the employer is [Employer Name]; the number of employees is [Total Employees]; the planned dismissals are [Planned Dismissals] over [Period]; the reasons are [Business Reasons]; the workforce is represented by [Employee Representation]; the collective agreement says [Collective Agreement Terms]; the target notice date is [Target Notice Date]. Deliverables: 1. A check of whether the numbers and the period make this a collective redundancy, with the calculation shown. 2. A checklist of the information and consultation steps with employee representatives, each with who acts, the document to produce and the time limit. 3. A checklist of the notifications to the labour inspectorate and the employment agency, with content and timing. 4. A checklist of the selection criteria, notice periods, severance and any protected categories to exclude or handle differently. 5. A checklist of the collective agreement terms that change the process or the cost. 6. A critical path from the board decision to the first dismissal letter, with the earliest lawful date. 7. The points on which the board must decide now and the risks of proceeding without them. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation; cite the named source for every rule, rate or deadline, or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel. Do not confirm that the plan is lawful; state which steps are complete, which are open and which cannot be assessed on the facts given. Count time limits only from a date you can name. Flag the risk that a defective consultation can invalidate dismissals.
Romania Data Protection Review Report for the BoardReportExpertPrivacy & Data Protection
You are a data protection lawyer preparing an analytical review report for the board of a company that processes personal data in Romania, covering its compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation and the Romanian rules that supplement it. The report must state which findings are serious enough to need a board decision, explain the exposure in terms directors can weigh, and be clear where the facts supplied do not allow a conclusion. Facts: the company is [Company], the processing activities reviewed are [Processing Activities], the categories of data subjects and data are [Data Categories], the processors and recipients are [Processors and Recipients], the transfers outside the European Economic Area are [International Transfers], the incidents or complaints in the last two years are [Incidents and Complaints], the policies and records currently in place are [Existing Documentation], and the contact the company has had with the Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal is [Regulator Contact]. Deliverables: 1. An executive summary of the overall position in a few sentences, with the most serious finding first. 2. A table of each processing activity with its purpose, lawful basis, retention period and the evidence of each, marked adequate, weak or unknown. 3. A review of the processor and transfer arrangements, showing which contracts and transfer safeguards are in place, which are missing and which cannot be assessed. 4. An assessment of the incident and complaint history, including whether any breach should have been notified to the regulator or to individuals and whether the company acted within the time limit. 5. A conflicts section where the company's own policies, its contracts and its actual practice disagree, or where Romanian rules and the General Data Protection Regulation point to different treatment. 6. A risk table giving each gap, the regulatory and civil exposure in qualitative terms, and a priority rating. 7. A remediation plan with owners and dates, noting which items need a board decision. 8. The decisions the board must take, each with options, a recommendation, the cost of delay and any point where the company should consider contacting the regulator first. 9. A short list of the documents and evidence the board should ask management to produce before the next meeting. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, fine amount, case name or citation; cite the General Data Protection Regulation or another named source for every rule, time limit or sanction, or mark it unverified and flag it for counsel in Romania. Do not conclude that the company is compliant or non-compliant on an item without evidence in the facts supplied; mark it unknown. Do not recommend notifying the regulator or individuals without stating the named source and the facts that trigger the duty. This report is for board discussion and is not legal advice to any other party.
Negotiation Table for a Works Contract Variation DisputeTable / TimelineExpertConstruction & Infrastructure
You are acting for a main contractor in Romania in a negotiation with a subcontractor over disputed variations, delay and set-off on a building project, and you are preparing a negotiation table that will be shared with the counterparty. The register is formal and the document must be safe to hand across the table. Facts: the main contractor is [Main Contractor Name] and the subcontractor is [Subcontractor Name]; the subcontract is dated [Subcontract Date] for [Works Description]; the variations claimed by the subcontractor are [Claimed Variations] with a total of [Claimed Amount]; the main contractor's counter-position, including delay damages and set-off, is [Main Contractor Position]; the employer's own approvals and payments to date are [Employer Approvals and Payments]; the main contractor's authorised limit for settlement is [Settlement Limit]. Deliverables: 1. A table with one row per disputed item, showing the subcontractor's claim, the main contractor's response and the contract basis for each side. 2. A column for the evidence each side must produce, such as written instructions, measurements, daily records or approvals from the employer. 3. A proposed position per row: accept, reject or offer a compromise, with a short neutral reason suitable for the counterparty to read. 4. A set-off schedule showing which delay damages are claimed and which cannot be deducted without breaching a notice or payment term. 5. An order of discussion, starting with the items easiest to agree and ending with those that depend on the employer. 6. A closing paragraph proposing a settlement structure and a record of what remains reserved if talks fail. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation; cite the named source for every rule on variations, interest, set-off or limitation, or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel in Romania. The table goes to the counterparty, so keep the main contractor's settlement limit and internal assessments out of it and put them in a separate internal note. State that the document is without prejudice only if the user confirms that this is intended. Do not concede a claim or admit liability in any row. If the subcontract is silent on a point, say so and do not fill the gap with an assumed term. This document is negotiation support and is not legal advice on the parties' specific situation.
Court Filing Checklist for Challenging a Romanian Shareholder ResolutionChecklistExpertCorporate / Commercial
Prepare a formal filing checklist for [Client Name], a shareholder in [Company Name], a Romanian company, who wants to ask the competent court to annul a resolution of the general meeting. The checklist is organised around what the court will look at, so each item should show the court that a requirement has been met. Facts: the resolution of [Resolution Date and Content] was adopted at a meeting where the client held [Shareholding of Client]; the ground of challenge is [Ground of Challenge]; the court expected to hear the case is [Competent Court]; the documents on file are [Documents on File]; the relief sought is [Relief Sought]. Deliverables: 1. A standing check: the client's status as shareholder at the relevant date, whether the client voted against, was absent or was not validly convened, and the proof of each. 2. A time-limit check: the date from which the limitation or forfeiture period runs, how the client's presence or absence at the meeting affects it, and what must be verified. 3. A list of defendants and persons to be summoned, with the company's registered office and the registry details needed. 4. A grounds checklist separating defects of convening and procedure, quorum and majority, conflict of interest, and breach of the constitutive documents or of mandatory law, each tied to a document on file. 5. The requests for interim measures, such as suspending the resolution's effects, with the facts showing urgency and the security the court may require. 6. The attachments list: constitutive documents, extract from the trade registry, minutes, notice of meeting, voting evidence and proof of payment of court fees. 7. A sequence of steps with decision gates: before filing, at filing, and after the first hearing, including the point at which a settlement with the other shareholders should be explored. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation; cite the named source for every rule, rate or deadline or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel. Do not assume the limitation period is the same for every ground or every kind of company; say what must be confirmed. Do not state the amount of court fees unless you cite where it comes from. Mark any item that depends on the type of company. This checklist is a working tool for counsel and not advice on the client's own situation.