Prompts
Prompts de IA jurídica para Egypt
3 prompts you can paste straight into HAQQ or any other assistant. Every one is written out in full - open it, copy it, change the bracketed parts.
Extinction of Criminal Action on a Dishonoured ChequeMemoExpertCriminal Defense
Under Egyptian law, determine whether the criminal action for issuing a cheque without sufficient funds has lapsed on the following facts. Facts: cheque drawn [date], bank refused payment [date], police report drawn up [date], first investigative or charging step [date], any subsequent interrupting step and its date [details]. Deliverables: 1. The classification of the offence (misdemeanour / contravention) and the period after which the criminal action lapses by effluxion of time, with the provision. 2. When the period starts to run: from the drawing of the cheque, the refusal, or knowledge — and what the courts have settled. 3. A timeline showing each interrupting step and its effect, then the arithmetic conclusion. 4. The other grounds of extinction available here — conciliation, payment of the cheque amount, waiver, death — and the effect of each on the criminal and the civil action. 5. The procedural objection to be raised and at what stage. Mandatory rules: cite the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Egyptian Commercial Code articles. If a different classification changes the period, present both hypotheses. Do not state a conclusion if the date of an interrupting step is unknown — tell me what you need from me.
Court of Cassation Authority on Medical DamagesMemoExpertPersonal Injury
Collect what the Egyptian Court of Cassation has settled on compensation for medical negligence, in preparation for a memorandum in a case concerning [describe the facts]. Deliverables: 1. The settled principles, one by one, with the provision each rests on, and whether it is settled doctrine or a recent trend. 2. Characterising the doctor's liability: contractual or tortious, an obligation of means or of result, and the circumstances in which it converts. 3. Burden of proof: on whom it falls, when it shifts, the role of the forensic medical report and the expert committee report, and how far the court is bound by them. 4. The heads of compensation the court accepts, those it usually refuses, and the criteria for assessment. 5. The hospital's liability for its employee's fault, and the validity of any exclusion clause. 6. What my file is missing before these principles can be applied. Strict rule: do not invent an appeal number, a judicial year, or a hearing date. If you know the principle but not the judgment that established it, state the principle and write plainly "citation not identified — verify in the Cassation reports before pleading it". A memorandum citing a judgment that does not exist is worse than one citing nothing.
Appointing an Arbitrator by PetitionMemoExpertArbitration
Set out the mechanism for appointing an arbitrator by petition under Egyptian law, compared with English law. Facts: arbitration clause [quote it], agreed number of arbitrators [number], the party in default of appointment [details], date of the invitation to appoint [date]. Deliverables: 1. The court or body competent to appoint in Egypt, the provision, and the form of the application and its documents. 2. The period that must elapse before applying to the court, and how it is computed. 3. Whether the appointment issues as an order on petition or as a judgment inter partes, and what that does to its appealability. 4. The criteria binding on the court in choosing — independence, impartiality, nationality, expertise. 5. A comparison table with the English mechanism: body, form, timing, and appealability. 6. The effect on the arbitration if the appointment is defective, and whether it later vitiates the award. Mandatory rules: cite the article of the Egyptian Arbitration Law and the corresponding section of the English legislation. Where you are not confident of an equivalent in one of the two systems, write "not found" rather than reasoning across by analogy.