Prompts
Juristische KI-Prompts: Explain / Advise
21 Prompts, die Sie direkt in HAQQ oder einen anderen Assistenten einfügen können. Jeder ist vollständig ausgeschrieben. Öffnen, kopieren, die Teile in eckigen Klammern anpassen.
Equity Incentive Plan SummaryMemoStandardEmployment
Acting as counsel, draft an employee-facing summary of [Company's] equity incentive plan. Produce it as a plain-language summary document. Facts: the client is [Company]. Deliverables: 1. Grant types (options, RSUs, etc.). 2. Vesting schedules. 3. Exercise procedures. 4. Tax implications. 5. What happens to equity upon termination or change of control. Mandatory rules: flag any tax treatment or [Jurisdiction] rule you cannot attribute to the plan document or a named statute, rather than stating it as fact.
Franchisor Obligations Letter to an Australian BoardLetter / EmailExpertFranchise & Distribution
You are counsel in Australia writing a short letter to the board of a franchisor to explain what the company must do before and during the signing of new franchisees. Be concise and direct: directors should finish the letter knowing what is required, who is responsible and what the exposure is if it is missed. Write in a formal register suitable for the board record. Facts: the franchisor is [Franchisor Name]; the business is [Franchise Business]; the company plans to sign [Number of New Franchisees] new franchisees by [Target Date]; the current documents are [Current Documents]; the people responsible for franchise sales are [Responsible Roles]; the board's concern is [Board Concern]; the franchise agreement covers [Territories and Fees]. Deliverables: 1. An opening paragraph that states the purpose of the letter and the main conclusion. 2. An explanation of the disclosure duties owed to a prospective franchisee, in the order in which they arise in the sales process. 3. An explanation of the agreement terms the franchisee may rely on regardless of what the contract says, such as cooling-off and restrictions on certain payments. 4. A paragraph on the standards of conduct expected during negotiation and during the relationship, including good faith. 5. A list of the internal controls the board should require, with an owner for each. 6. A paragraph on the consequences of non-compliance, including regulator action and franchisee remedies. 7. A closing paragraph with the decisions the board is asked to make at its next meeting. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, section number, case name or citation; cite the named source for every rule, period or penalty, or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel. Refer to the Franchising Code of Conduct by name only and do not quote its clause numbers, time periods or penalty amounts unless you can cite the source. State plainly that the letter does not replace a review of the company's actual documents. Do not assure the board that it is compliant.
Plain Memo Explaining an IP Licence to a ClientMemoExpertIP / Licensing
You are counsel explaining an intellectual property licence to the client who is the licensee, in a concise memo that a non-lawyer founder can act on. Take the law of [Jurisdiction] as a placeholder for the governing law and say which points would change under a different law. Facts: the client is [Client Name], the licensee; the licensor is [Licensor]; the licensed rights are [Licensed Rights]; the field and territory are [Field and Territory]; the main commercial terms are [Commercial Terms]; the client's plan for the licensed rights is [Client Plan]; the licence text is attached. Deliverables: 1. A two-sentence summary of what the client is actually getting and what it is not. 2. An explanation of exclusivity, field of use and territory, with an example of what the client may and may not do. 3. An explanation of payments, minimums, audit rights and what happens if the client misses a payment. 4. An explanation of sublicensing, improvements and ownership of anything the client develops. 5. An explanation of termination, what survives and what the client must stop doing on exit. 6. The five questions the client should put to the licensor before signing. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, section number, case name or citation; cite the named source for every rule, rate or deadline, or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel. Quote the clause for every right and obligation you describe and say not stated where the licence is silent. Do not tell the client that it owns or may use anything the licence does not grant. Explain terms of art in one line each. The memo is general explanation and not advice on the client's specific plan until a lawyer has reviewed the full licence.
Franchise Basics FAQ for Oman FranchiseesQ&A / ExplainerAdvancedFranchise & Distribution
You are a lawyer in Oman explaining franchise basics in plain language to a prospective franchisee, as a short FAQ the client can read before meeting the franchisor. Use everyday words and explain any legal term the first time you use it. Facts: the franchisor is [Franchisor Name], the brand is [Franchise Brand], the upfront fee is [Franchise Fee], the territory is [Territory], and the proposed term is [Term in Years]. Deliverables: 1. What a franchise is and how it differs from a licence, a distributorship and a commercial agency in Oman. 2. What the client pays, when, and what is usually refundable or not. 3. What the franchisor can control, such as suppliers, prices, hours and opening standards, and what it cannot. 4. What happens at the end of the term: renewal, termination, handover of the premises and non-competition. 5. Five questions to ask the franchisor and five documents to ask for before signing. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation; cite the named source for every rule, rate or deadline, or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel in Oman. Do not tell the client that a clause is enforceable or that the franchise will be profitable. This FAQ is general information and not legal advice on the client's specific situation.
Plain-Language Letter Explaining Our Legal Request ProcessLetter / EmailExpertLegal Ops / Billing
You are the head of legal operations at an organization that receives legal requests from the public, such as complaints, data access requests, claims and demands, and you are writing a plain-language letter to the people who send them, explaining how the organization handles a request from receipt to reply. Use short sentences and everyday words, explain any legal term once, and avoid promising outcomes the organization cannot guarantee. Facts: the organization is [Organization], the types of request handled are [Request Types], the intake channel is [Intake Channel], the acknowledgement and reply periods the organization commits to are [Response Timelines], the team that decides is [Deciding Team], the escalation or appeal route is [Escalation Route], and the information the sender must provide is [Required Information]. Deliverables: 1. The letter itself, opening with what the organization will do, what the sender can expect and when, in under three paragraphs. 2. A numbered step-by-step account of what happens to a request from receipt to final reply, with who handles each step and how long it takes. 3. A checklist of the information and documents the sender should include, and what happens if something is missing. 4. A plain explanation of the possible outcomes, including when a request may be refused or only partly met, and the reason that will be given. 5. A short section on what the sender can do if they disagree, including the escalation route and any outside body they may contact. 6. A note on how personal information in the request is used, kept and shared, and for how long. 7. A set of answers to the five questions senders ask most often, each in two sentences or fewer. 8. A checklist for the internal team confirming that every commitment in the letter matches the real process and the timelines the law or policy sets. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, deadline, case name or citation; cite the named source for every legal deadline, right or duty stated in the letter, or mark it unverified and flag it for the organization's counsel before sending. Do not promise a result or a date the organization cannot meet, and where the stated timeline and the legal one differ, use the shorter and flag the difference. Do not give legal advice to the sender; direct them to an independent adviser where they need one. Leave out internal names, case numbers and anything confidential.
MENA Medical Device Market Entry MemoMemoEnterpriseHealthcare & Life Sciences
You are counsel to [Client Name], a manufacturer of [Product Description], and you are explaining in a concise memo how the client can put the product on the market in several MENA countries. The client is a business reader, so explain each regulatory step in a sentence or two and say why it matters. Facts: the product is classed by the client as [Risk Class] and is [Software or Hardware or Both]; the first target countries are [Target Countries]; the manufacturing site is in [Manufacturing Country] and holds [Existing Approvals]; the local distributors are [Distributors]; the client plans [Clinical Data Position] and wants to launch by [Launch Date]. Deliverables: 1. A one-paragraph answer on the realistic route to market and the main obstacle. 2. For each target country, the regulator, the type of authorisation, whether it relies on approvals from another country and the local presence required. 3. How the countries differ on classification, so that the same product may fall in a different class in each, and what that means for the file. 4. The role of the local authorised representative or distributor, the allocation of liability between them and the client, and the points to put in the distribution contract. 5. The order in which to file, with the dependencies between countries and the decision gates where the client could stop or change the plan. 6. Where requirements from different countries conflict, for example on labelling language or clinical evidence, and how to build one file that satisfies the strictest. 7. Post-market duties: vigilance reporting, recalls and change notifications, and who is responsible. 8. The costs and timing in ranges, the assumptions behind them and the facts that would change them. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation; cite the named source for every requirement or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel in each country. Do not assume a country recognises another's approval. Do not give a launch date as certain. State what you could not verify and what the client must confirm with each regulator.
Off-Plan Property Purchase FAQ for the PublicQ&A / ExplainerExpertReal Estate (Personal)
You are a property lawyer writing a concise FAQ for members of the public in [Jurisdiction] who are thinking of buying a home off plan, that is, before it is built. Write for readers with no legal training, in short sentences, and explain any legal term the first time you use it. Facts: the reader is a [Buyer Type] considering a [Property Type] from a [Seller Type]; the price is about [Price Range]; the buyer plans to pay with [Payment Method]; the promised completion is [Completion Timeframe]; the reader's main worry is [Reader Concern]. Deliverables: 1. What an off-plan purchase is and the main stages from reservation to handover. 2. What to check about the seller and the land before paying anything, and where such records can usually be found. 3. How the deposit and instalments are protected, and what to ask about escrow or guarantees. 4. What the contract should say about completion date, specification, changes and delay, and what remedies the buyer may have. 5. What happens if the developer becomes insolvent or the project stops. 6. The taxes, fees and ongoing costs a buyer should budget for. 7. Warning signs that a seller or an offer may not be genuine. 8. When to get a local lawyer and what to bring to the first meeting. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation; cite the named source for every rule, fee or deadline that you state for [Jurisdiction], or mark it unverified and tell the reader to confirm it with a local lawyer. This FAQ is general information, not legal advice for the reader's own purchase, and it must say so. Do not guarantee that any protection exists; say that protection varies by country and by project. Do not recommend a developer, a bank or a product.
Plain-Language FAQ on Quitting a Lebanese JobQ&A / ExplainerStandardEmployment
You are a Lebanese employment lawyer explaining to a client, an employee who is thinking of resigning, what happens if they leave. Write a plain-language FAQ a non-lawyer can follow, with short sentences and no jargon. Facts: the client works as [Job Title] at [Employer Name] and has been there for [Years of Service]; the contract is [Contract Type]; the client's monthly pay is [Monthly Pay]; and the client wants to leave on [Planned Leave Date] because of [Reason for Leaving]. Deliverables: 1. Does the client have to give notice, and how long, in simple terms. 2. What money the client can expect on leaving, such as unpaid salary, leave pay and end-of-service payments. 3. Whether resigning changes the client's rights compared with being dismissed. 4. What to do before handing in the resignation letter, and what to keep as proof. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation, and cite the named source for every rule, amount or deadline, or mark it unverified and flag it for a Lebanese lawyer to confirm. Do not promise a specific payment figure. Say that the answers are general information that depends on the client's own contract and documents.
Public Letter on Residence and Work in TurkeyLetter / EmailEnterpriseImmigration
You are an immigration lawyer in Turkey writing a plain-language information letter for members of the public, such as people who have moved or plan to move to Turkey and are unsure which permit they need. The letter explains the options and the order of steps, and it is general information, not advice for any one person. Facts: the reader is a [Nationality] national who is currently [Current Status] and wants to [Goal in Turkey]; the reader has been in Turkey since [Arrival Date] under [Current Permission]; there is a family link with [Family Situation]; the reader has [Employment or Study Offer]; and the reader's main worry is [Reader Concern]. Deliverables: 1. A warm opening that says what the letter covers and what it does not. 2. The main permit routes in simple terms: short-term residence, longer residence, work authorisation, student status and family-based status, and which one fits the reader's goal. 3. Who applies for what, and whether the employer, the school or the reader files, and whether a change of purpose is possible from inside Turkey. 4. The steps in order, with the usual documents for each and where translations or legalisation are needed. 5. What happens if the current permission is about to expire or has expired, including overstay consequences described cautiously. 6. How time spent in Turkey under each route counts, or does not count, towards later long-term residence or citizenship. 7. Rights and limits while an application is pending, such as working or leaving the country. 8. Where to get official help and what to bring. 9. A closing paragraph reminding the reader to check with a lawyer and the official authority before acting. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation, and cite the named source for every rule, fee or deadline, or mark it unverified and flag it for Turkish counsel. Practice and fees change often, so tell the reader to check current official guidance. Use short sentences, explain every legal term, and do not promise approval, timing or any result.
Plain-Language Board Memo on a Data Breach DutyMemoAdvancedPrivacy & Data Protection
You are counsel explaining to a company's board, in a plain-language memo, what the company must do now that a personal data breach has been discovered. Directors are not lawyers, so give them the decisions and the deadlines first and the reasons second. Facts: the company is [Company Name], operating in [Jurisdiction] and serving customers in [Customer Locations]; the incident was found on [Discovery Date] and involves [Incident Description]; the data affected is [Data Categories] relating to about [Number Affected] people; the containment status is [Containment Status]; and the board meets on [Board Meeting Date]. Deliverables: 1. A summary of the situation in five lines, with the main exposure. 2. A list of the reports and notices the company may have to make, to which authority or people, and the time limits that may already be running. 3. What counts as the start of the clock and who at the company decides whether the breach is notifiable. 4. The decisions the board should take at its meeting, in order. 5. What to do and not do in the next 72 hours, such as evidence preservation, communications and contacts with the press or customers. 6. The legal exposure in simple terms, including regulatory action, claims by affected people and contractual notice duties to business customers. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation, and cite the named source for every rule, fine or deadline, or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel in each place where customers are located. Treat [Jurisdiction] as the starting point and state that other places' rules may apply. Explain every legal term in one sentence, do not guess at facts not given, and make no statement that the company is or is not at fault.
Brazilian Energy Project Licensing Explainer MemoMemoAdvancedEnergy & Natural Resources
You are a lawyer in Brazil writing a concise memo that explains to a client, who is not a lawyer, how a proposed energy project will be authorised and what could delay it. Describe the Brazilian federal structure in general terms, including the roles of the federal energy regulator, the environmental licensing authorities at federal and state level, and the grid operator, and say where state or municipal rules add steps. Facts: the client is [Client Name] and the project is a [Project Type] of about [Project Capacity] in [Project Location]; the owner of the land is [Land Status]; the connection to the grid is planned through [Grid Connection]; the offtake arrangement is [Offtake Arrangement]; the funding source is [Funding Source]; and the target date for operation is [Target Operation Date]. Deliverables: 1. A short summary of the path from site control to operation, in the order the steps usually occur. 2. A table of each permit or approval, the authority that grants it, what triggers it and what typically delays it. 3. An explanation of how environmental licensing, land rights and indigenous or community consultation can change the timeline. 4. A list of the contract and financing steps that depend on a permit being in place. 5. The three decisions the client should take in the next month. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name, regulator resolution or citation, and cite the named source for every rule, time limit or fee you mention or mark it unverified and flag it for Brazilian counsel. Do not promise a timetable or the grant of any licence. Do not describe the rules of one state as the rule for all of Brazil. Explain each technical term the first time it is used, and keep the memo to two pages.
Public FAQ on Claims After an Insurance RefusalQ&A / ExplainerExpertInsurance
You are a lawyer writing a public question and answer page, in plain and concise language, for people whose insurer has refused or reduced a claim in [Jurisdiction]. The page must help an ordinary policyholder understand the steps without giving advice on any individual claim, and it must work for the main kinds of cover, namely property, motor, health, life and business interruption. Facts: the page is published by [Publisher Name] for readers who hold [Type of Policy]; the usual reasons given for refusal are [Common Refusal Reasons]; the complaint and dispute routes available are [Complaint Routes]; the regulator or ombudsman, if any, is [Regulator or Ombudsman]; the page language level is [Reading Level]; and the page will be reviewed on [Review Date]. Deliverables: 1. An opening paragraph saying what the page covers and what it does not. 2. Twelve questions with answers of two to four sentences each, ordered from the first steps after a refusal to the last resort. 3. A question on how to read a refusal letter, with the three things to check first. 4. A question on time limits, explaining that they exist and where to find the exact one, without stating any figure unless a source is cited. 5. A question on the difference between a refusal, a partial payment and a delay, and what each means for the policyholder. 6. A question on disclosure duties and when a failure to disclose can affect a claim. 7. A question on complaints, ombudsman or regulator routes and court action, with the order in which to use them. 8. A question on when to speak to a lawyer, a broker or a loss assessor. 9. A closing disclaimer that the page is general information and not legal advice. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name, regulator rule or citation, and cite the named source for every rule, time limit or entitlement or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel. Do not promise that a claim will succeed or that a complaint will be upheld. Do not tell readers to withhold information from an insurer. Do not name any insurer, broker or competitor.
Board Letter on a Jordanian Tender DisputeLetter / EmailEnterprisePublic Procurement
You are a lawyer writing a concise but complete letter to the board of a company that lost, or was disqualified from, a public tender in Jordan, explaining where the company stands and what the realistic options are. Reflect the Jordanian public procurement framework in general terms, including the procuring entity, the tender review mechanism, the specialised review bodies, the administrative justice route, and the effect of a challenge on the tender timetable, and explain what is mandatory and what is discretionary. The letter must be readable by directors who are not lawyers. Facts: the company is [Company Name] and the procuring entity is [Procuring Entity]; the tender is [Tender Reference] for [Tender Subject] worth [Tender Value]; the decision was [Decision Taken] and communicated on [Decision Date]; the reasons given were [Reasons Given]; the bid security and costs at risk are [Bid Security and Costs]; the competing bidder awarded the contract is [Awarded Bidder]; any complaint already filed is [Complaint Filed]; and our commercial objective is [Commercial Objective]. Deliverables: 1. An opening paragraph stating the situation and the recommendation. 2. A plain account of why the company lost or was disqualified, and whether the reasons given appear consistent with the tender documents. 3. The grounds on which the decision could be challenged and how strong each appears. 4. The review and appeal routes in order, with the body, the time limit to be verified and the effect on the award. 5. The risk to the bid security, the relationship with the procuring entity and future tenders if the company challenges. 6. The options of challenging, negotiating a remedy or accepting the result, with the cost and likely outcome range of each. 7. The decision the board must take, the date by which it must act and the documents to preserve. 8. A closing paragraph with next steps and who will do what. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name, tender regulation or citation, and cite the named source for every rule, time limit or fee or mark it unverified and flag it for Jordanian counsel. Do not state a deadline as certain without a cited source, and tell the board to treat any unverified deadline as the earliest possible. Do not predict that a challenge will succeed. Do not suggest contacting the awarded bidder or the evaluators outside the formal process.
Landowner Letter on an Energy Project in TurkeyLetter / EmailStarterEnergy & Natural Resources
You are writing a plain-language letter from an energy developer to the owners of land in Turkey that a planned power project may need, explaining what the process means for them in words they can follow without a lawyer. Facts: the developer is [Developer], the project is [Project type and location], the land concerned is [Parcels and owners], and the landowner can contact [Contact name and details]. Deliverables: 1. Why the developer is writing and what the project is, in three sentences. 2. The ways the land might be used, such as a lease, an easement right or a purchase, and how each differs for the owner. 3. What the owner is free to decide, what the owner can ask for and what happens if no agreement is reached. 4. The owner's right to take independent advice and the next steps with dates. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation, and cite the named source for every rule or deadline you state or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel. Do not promise a price, a permit or a timetable that the facts do not give. Do not pressure the owner to sign and do not suggest that expropriation is certain.
Iraqi State Borrower Recovery Explainer for the BoardMemoStandardInternational Debt & Restructuring
You are explaining to a board with no legal training, in plain language, how a lender could recover a loan owed by an Iraqi state entity and what could stand in the way, in a short memo that avoids jargon. Facts: the lender is [Lender], the borrower is [State entity], the loan is [Loan amount, currency and governing law], the dispute clause provides for [Dispute resolution clause], and the borrower has missed [Missed payments]. Deliverables: 1. A plain account of the realistic routes to recovery, such as negotiation, arbitration and court action, in the order the lender would normally try them. 2. The main obstacles to collecting from a state entity, including immunity, the status of the borrower's assets and the need to enforce in Iraq or abroad. 3. What the board should ask its lawyers and what documents to collect now. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation, and cite the named source for every rule or deadline or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel. Explain any legal term the first time it is used. Do not say that recovery is likely or unlikely; state what depends on facts not yet known.
EU Sanctions Export FAQ for Manufacturing ClientsQ&A / ExplainerEnterpriseSanctions & Trade
You are writing, in plain language, a question-and-answer guide for a manufacturing client that exports goods from the European Union through distributors and must understand how sanctions and export controls affect its sales, how its duties differ across the chain, and which rules take priority when systems conflict. Facts: the client is [Client], it is established in [Member State], its goods are [Goods and any dual-use features], its customers and distributors are in [Destination countries], its payments are routed through [Banks and currencies], the shipping route passes through [Transit countries], and the client also has [Links to other sanctions systems]. Deliverables: 1. What sanctions and export controls are, and how they differ from each other, in two short answers. 2. How to tell whether the goods need an export authorisation, and who decides. 3. What the client must check about customers, end users, intermediaries and ownership before accepting an order. 4. What a clause preventing re-export to a restricted destination can and cannot do, and what to do if a distributor refuses it. 5. What to do when a red flag appears in an order, a payment or a shipment, in the order the steps should be taken. 6. How the client's duties differ from those of its distributors, its bank and its freight forwarder. 7. What happens when EU rules, the rules of a Member State and the rules of another country point in different directions, and which the client must follow first. 8. What records to keep, for how long and who should review them. 9. When to stop and call a lawyer. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation, and cite the named source for every rule, list or deadline or mark it unverified and flag it for counsel in the Member State concerned. Sanctions lists change often, so tell the reader to check the current official list rather than relying on any list in your answer. Write each answer so a non-lawyer can act on it, explain any technical term, and do not tell the client that a particular transaction is lawful.
FAQ on Moving a Child After SeparationQ&A / ExplainerExpertFamily Law
You are writing a short FAQ for members of the public in [Jurisdiction] who are separated from the other parent and want to move with a child, within the country or abroad. Keep each answer concise, in plain words, and avoid giving the impression that any outcome is certain. Facts: the reader's situation is described as [Reader Situation]; the child is aged [Child Age] and lives mainly with [Primary Carer]; the move is to [Destination] for [Reason for Move]; the other parent [Other Parent Position]; any court order or agreement in place is [Existing Order or Agreement]; the parents' nationalities are [Parents Nationalities]. Deliverables: 1. A plain answer to whether one parent may move with the child without the other parent's agreement or a court decision. 2. What a court usually weighs when asked to allow a move, framed around the child's interests. 3. The practical steps to take before moving, including written agreement, mediation and applying to court. 4. What changes when the move is to another country, including the role of international child abduction rules if both countries are covered by them. 5. What happens if a parent moves anyway, and the risks for that parent. 6. A short list of documents and evidence to gather. 7. A closing answer on when to see a family lawyer and what to bring. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation; cite the named source for every rule or time limit, or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel in [Jurisdiction]. If the situation suggests violence or fear, say that safety comes first and name general support routes without inventing contact details. Do not tell the reader that they will win or lose, or what the court will order. Do not assume which parent has custody; ask when the facts do not say. This FAQ is general information and is not legal advice on any reader's specific situation.
Board Letter Explaining a German Cease-and-Desist WarningLetter / EmailAdvancedIP Disputes
You are explaining to the board of a company that has received a cease-and-desist warning from a competitor in Germany, known as an Abmahnung, what it means and what the company must decide. Write a short letter to the board in concise language, with no legal jargon the directors cannot follow. Facts: the company is [Company Name] and the sender of the warning is [Sender Name]; the warning alleges [Alleged IP Infringement]; it demands [Demands Made] by [Deadline Given]; it encloses a draft declaration to stop and pay a penalty if the conduct recurs, which says [Draft Declaration Terms]; the company's use of the disputed sign, work or product is [Company's Use]; the sender's claim for legal costs is [Costs Claimed]. Deliverables: 1. A paragraph explaining in plain words what an Abmahnung is and why it is usually the step before a court application for an injunction. 2. The three options open to the board: comply, respond with a modified declaration or reject, with the main consequence of each. 3. Why the deadline matters and what can happen if it passes, including the possibility of a fast interim court order. 4. A caution about the draft declaration, explaining that a signed declaration to stop can bind the company for a long time and may be wider than the alleged conduct. 5. The decision the board must take now, who should take advice and the information needed first. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, section number, case name or citation; cite the named source for every rule, time limit or costs principle, or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel in Germany. Do not tell the board to sign or to refuse. Do not say that the claim is well founded or baseless. Say that the deadline should be confirmed with German counsel at once and that nothing should be signed before then. This letter is general explanation for directors and is not legal advice on the company's specific situation.
Client Memo on Re-Export Risk for a UAE Trading CompanyMemoExpertSanctions & Trade
You are explaining to a client that runs a trading company in the United Arab Emirates why selling goods onward to third countries can create sanctions and export control exposure, even when the sale is lawful where the company sits. Write a concise memo for the client in plain English. Facts: the client is [Client Name], trading in [Goods Traded] with suppliers in [Supplier Countries] and customers in [Customer Countries]; the goods are routed through [Shipping Route]; the licence type is [Trade Licence Type] and the company is located in [Mainland or Free Zone]; the payment methods used are [Payment Methods]; the client's current screening practice is [Current Screening]; the transaction that prompted the question is [Prompting Transaction]. Deliverables: 1. A plain explanation of why a UAE company can be exposed to foreign sanctions and export control rules even when UAE law is silent, covering the role of goods, banks, currencies and parties. 2. A description of the UAE's own framework for domestic lists and controls, and of how it differs from foreign regimes, with the source for each point. 3. A list of red flags in a transaction, such as unusual routing, a customer unable to explain end use or a payment from an unrelated third party. 4. Practical controls the client can set up at low cost: screening of parties, end-use statements, contract clauses and record keeping. 5. The questions the client should answer about the prompting transaction before going ahead. 6. A closing statement of which decisions need specialist advice before the client proceeds. Mandatory rules: never invent a sanctions measure, statute, list entry, licence number or citation; cite the named source for every rule, or mark it unverified and flag it for sanctions counsel in the UAE. Say that sanctions lists change and that any party or good must be checked against the current official lists at the time of the deal. Do not tell the client that a given deal is safe or unlawful. Do not suggest ways to disguise the destination or the parties. This memo is not legal advice on the client's specific situation.
Plain-Language Memo on Payments Licensing in NigeriaMemoExpertFinTech / Payments
Explain to the board of [Company Name], in a plain-language memo, what it needs to be allowed to launch a payments product in Nigeria and what could go wrong if it launches without it. The board has no legal training, so avoid jargon and define each term once. Facts: the product is [Product Description] aimed at [Target Customers]; the planned launch date is [Launch Date]; the company is owned and funded by [Ownership and Funding]; the partner it may rely on is [Partner Bank or Provider]; the question the board has asked is [Board Question]. Deliverables: 1. A one-paragraph answer to [Board Question], with how sure you are. 2. Who regulates the product and what kind of licence or approval each regulator is likely to require, in a short table the board can read at a glance. 3. The two routes to market compared: obtaining its own licence or operating through a licensed partner, with the time, control and risk of each. 4. What the company must show to obtain approval, such as capital, local presence, ownership and fit-and-proper checks, as far as these can be stated without inventing figures. 5. The consequences of launching without the right approval, for the company, its directors and its partners. 6. How foreign ownership, foreign currency and data protection affect the plan, each in two or three sentences. 7. Three decisions for the board with a recommended option for each and the cost of waiting. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation; cite the named source for every rule, rate or deadline or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel. Do not state a capital threshold, fee or processing time unless you cite where it comes from. Separate what the central bank decides from what other regulators decide. Do not assume the product fits one licence category merely because of its name. This memo explains the regulatory position in general and is not advice on the company's specific situation.
Plain-Language FAQ on Exclusive and Non-Exclusive LicencesQ&A / ExplainerStarterIP / Licensing
Explain to [Client Name], who is not a lawyer, the difference between an exclusive and a non-exclusive licence of [IP Asset] under the law of [Jurisdiction], as a short plain-language FAQ. Facts: the client is deciding which kind of licence to grant or accept for [IP Asset], and the law of [Jurisdiction] will govern the licence. Deliverables: 1. What each kind of licence means, in two sentences each. 2. Who can use the asset, license it to others or sue an infringer under each kind. 3. The questions the client should ask before choosing, with a simple example. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation; cite the named source for every rule, rate or deadline or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel. Use short sentences and explain each legal term the first time it appears. Say where the rules of [Jurisdiction] may differ from the general explanation. This FAQ is general information and not advice on the client's own situation.