Prompts
Juristische KI-Prompts für China
4 Prompts, die Sie direkt in HAQQ oder einen anderen Assistenten einfügen können. Jeder ist vollständig ausgeschrieben. Öffnen, kopieren, die Teile in eckigen Klammern anpassen.
Sanctions Clause Negotiation Table for the BoardTable / TimelineExpertSanctions & Trade
You are counsel to [Company Name], which is negotiating a supply contract with a Chinese counterparty, and you are preparing a persuasive table for the board that asks it to approve a negotiating mandate on the sanctions and export-control clauses. The table must make the case that the proposed positions protect the company and are achievable, while being honest about the legal conflict the company faces. Facts: the company is incorporated in [Company Jurisdiction] and the counterparty is [Counterparty Description]; the goods or services are [Goods or Services] and include [Controlled Items]; the payment route is [Payment Route and Currency]; the sanctions regimes that touch the company are [Applicable Regimes]; the counterparty's draft clause says [Counterparty Draft Clause]; the contract value is [Contract Value]. Deliverables: 1. A table by clause topic (sanctions representation, compliance covenant, termination right, payment suspension, export-control undertaking, audit and information) with our proposed wording, the counterparty's likely objection and our answer. 2. The conflict between the sanctions regimes that bind the company and the Chinese counter-measures, including the blocking and anti-foreign-sanctions rules, and what compliance with one may mean for the other. 3. A recommended structure that lets the company comply with its own regimes without breaching the counterparty's home law, such as notice, suspension and termination mechanics. 4. The persuasive case for each position in two sentences, led by the commercial benefit to the counterparty. 5. The fallback options and the point at which management should return to the board for a decision. 6. The risks the board is accepting if the mandate is approved, in plain terms. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation; cite the named source for every rule or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel in each relevant jurisdiction, including China. Name a law or a regulator only if you are certain it exists, for example the Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law, and otherwise describe it. Do not tell the board that a clause makes the company compliant, or that a clause is enforceable in China, without the named source. Do not suggest ways to evade a sanctions regime or to disguise the origin, destination or end use of goods.
China Generative AI Service Compliance ChecklistChecklistEnterpriseTechnology & AI Regulation
You are a lawyer on the internal legal team of a foreign technology company that plans to offer a generative artificial intelligence service to users in mainland China, and you will produce an analytical compliance checklist for the product, legal and security teams. Reflect the Chinese regulatory framework in general terms, including rules on generative AI services, algorithm filing, deep synthesis and content labelling, content security and the cybersecurity regulator, personal information protection, data security and cross-border data transfer, and the requirements that foreign investment and telecom licensing place on the operating entity. Say where a requirement depends on whether the service is offered to the public, and where national, sector and local rules overlap. Facts: the company is [Company Name] and the planned service is [Service Description]; the model is [Model Origin] trained on [Training Data Sources]; the users are [User Groups]; the operating entity in China is [Operating Entity]; the data processed includes [Data Categories]; the hosting and any cross-border flows are [Hosting and Data Flows]; the content the service can generate is [Content Types]; and the planned launch date is [Launch Date]. Deliverables: 1. A threshold section determining which regimes apply to this service and why. 2. A checklist of licences, registrations and filings needed before launch, with the authority and the sequence. 3. A checklist of model and training data requirements, including lawful source, intellectual property and quality controls. 4. A checklist of content security duties, including review mechanisms, complaint handling and generated content labelling. 5. A checklist of personal information duties, including legal basis, notice, consent, minors and user rights. 6. A checklist of data security and cross-border transfer duties, with the mechanism needed for each flow. 7. A checklist of corporate, foreign investment and telecom licensing points for the operating entity. 8. A table of open items rated blocking, high or manageable, with an owner and a suggested date. 9. A list of facts that must be confirmed because the answer changes the applicable regime. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, regulation, measure name, article number, case name or citation, and cite the named source for every rule, threshold or deadline or mark it unverified and flag it for Chinese counsel. Do not treat a draft or proposed measure as in force; label its status. Do not assume that a foreign model or data centre outside China is lawful for this service without a cited basis. Mark every item as met, not met or unknown, and never as met where facts are missing.
Exclusivity Clause Antitrust Check for ChinaReportStandardCompetition & Antitrust
You are reviewing the exclusivity and pricing terms of a distribution arrangement for a client selling in China, to flag competition law risk. Keep the report concise and use plain business wording. Facts: the client is [Client Name], a [Supplier or Distributor] of [Product or Service]; the other party is [Counterparty Name]; the terms under review are [Exclusivity and Pricing Terms]; the client's estimated share of the relevant market is [Market Share Estimate]. Deliverables: 1. A one-paragraph risk summary naming the terms most likely to attract scrutiny. 2. A short list of the terms, each marked as low, medium or high risk with a one-sentence reason. 3. Suggested redrafting directions for the medium and high risk terms. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation; cite the named source for every rule or threshold, or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel in China. Do not conclude that a term is lawful or unlawful, only how exposed it looks. Ask for the market share basis if the estimate is missing. This report is not legal advice on the client's specific situation.
Research Report on Exporting Personal Data from ChinaReportEnterprisePrivacy & Data Protection
You are researching the legal conditions under which a multinational group may transfer personal data collected in China to group companies and vendors abroad, and writing a formal research report for the group's in-house legal team. The group has several data flows with different purposes, volumes and recipients, so the report must reach a separate conclusion for each flow. Facts: the group is [Group Name] and the Chinese entity is [Chinese Entity Name]; the data flows are [Data Flow List] with data types of [Data Types] and volumes of [Data Volumes]; the overseas recipients are [Overseas Recipients] in [Recipient Countries]; the purposes are [Purposes]; the sector of the Chinese entity is [Sector]; the safeguards already in place are [Existing Safeguards]; the local personnel who handle the data are [Local Handlers]. Deliverables: 1. An executive summary stating, for each data flow, the transfer route that appears to apply and the main open question. 2. The general framework in China for cross-border transfers of personal information, with the source for each condition. 3. A test, applied flow by flow, for which mechanism is needed: a government security assessment, a standard contract filed with the authority, a certification, or an exemption. 4. The rules on sensitive personal information, separate consent and notice to individuals that apply to each flow. 5. The treatment of important data and of data from regulated sectors, and how to check whether either arises. 6. The impact assessment and record-keeping the group must complete before transfer. 7. A section on conflicts between Chinese rules and those of the recipient countries or of the group's home jurisdiction, and how the group can handle a request from a foreign authority for data held in China. 8. A list of open questions for the Chinese entity and for local counsel, and a proposed sequence of work. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, regulation, article number, authority name, threshold or citation; cite the named source for every rule, volume threshold or filing requirement, or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel in China. Rules on cross-border data change often, so give the date of every source and say the report must be checked against current official texts. Do not conclude that any flow is permitted; say what must be satisfied. If the facts do not allow a flow to be classified, say what is missing. This report is not legal advice on the group's specific situation.