Prompt

Prompt di IA legale per Personal Injury

9 prompts you can paste straight into HAQQ or any other assistant. Every one is written out in full. Open it, copy it, change the bracketed parts.

• Traffic Accident Compensation From a Disability RatingReportAdvancedStrategy / Scenario

  My client was injured in a road accident on [date], aged [age] at the time. I act for the injured party. The accident caused [describe the injuries], and a disability rating of [percentage]% was assessed with an incapacity period of [period]. Monthly income [amount]. Jurisdiction [jurisdiction].
  Deliverables:
  1. The heads of compensation due, each separately: permanent disability, loss of income during incapacity, loss of future earning capacity, past and future medical expenses, moral damage, and third-party costs if any.
  2. The method of calculation for each head, with the formula, the multiplier used and its source: statute, schedule, or case law.
  3. A full numerical calculation on the facts above, showing the steps, and then a low-to-high range rather than a single figure.
  4. What is deducted: insurance payments received, contributory fault, and any social security sums.
  5. The procedural route: a civil claim joined to the criminal proceedings or a standalone action, the competent forum, and the limitation period.
  6. The documents needed to prove each head, and what is missing from the file.
  Mandatory rules: do not invent a multiplier or a compensation schedule. Where the multiplier is a matter of judicial discretion, say so and give a range rather than a single number. Cite the article for each head that has a statutory basis.

• Court of Cassation Authority on Medical DamagesMemoExpertResearch / Authorities

  I act for the [patient / hospital]. Collect what the Egyptian Court of Cassation has settled on compensation for medical negligence, in preparation for a memorandum in a case concerning [describe the facts].
  Deliverables:
  1. The settled principles, one by one, with the provision each rests on, and whether it is settled doctrine or a recent trend.
  2. Characterising the doctor's liability: contractual or tortious, an obligation of means or of result, and the circumstances in which it converts.
  3. Burden of proof: on whom it falls, when it shifts, the role of the forensic medical report and the expert committee report, and how far the court is bound by them.
  4. The heads of compensation the court accepts, those it usually refuses, and the criteria for assessment.
  5. The hospital's liability for its employee's fault, and the validity of any exclusion clause.
  6. What my file is missing before these principles can be applied.
  Strict rule: do not invent an appeal number, a judicial year, or a hearing date. If you know the principle but not the judgment that established it, state the principle and write plainly "citation not identified. Verify in the Cassation reports before pleading it". A memorandum citing a judgment that does not exist is worse than one citing nothing.

• Car Accident DemandMemoAdvancedDraft / Generate

  I act for the injured party in a car accident on [date] at [location] caused by [driver]. Draft a demand letter to [insurer].
  Facts: the medical treatment received to date and any ongoing treatment, wages lost and the basis for calculating them, property damage, and the policy limits known for [driver]'s coverage.
  Deliverables:
  1. A liability summary: how [driver] caused the accident, referencing the police report or witness statements available.
  2. An itemised damages section: medical expenses to date, projected future medical costs, lost wages, and property damage, each with the supporting document it should cite.
  3. A pain and suffering component, with the basis for the figure stated (multiplier or per diem method, and why that method fits the facts).
  4. The total demand figure, stated as an opening position that leaves room for negotiation.
  5. A deadline for [insurer] to respond, and the next step stated if it does not.
  Mandatory rules: state a damages figure, medical fact or wage-loss calculation only where it is supported by a specific document or record described in the facts. Do not assert liability as settled fact if it depends on evidence not yet confirmed; flag it as requiring the police report or witness statement instead.

• Slip and FallMemoAdvancedStrategy / Scenario

  I was injured in a slip-and-fall at [premises] on [date], caused by [hazard]. Analyse whether I can recover.
  Facts: how long [hazard] was present before the fall if known, any warning signage or barrier in place, my footwear and conduct at the time, and any witnesses or video coverage of the area.
  Deliverables:
  1. The notice element: whether the premises owner or occupier knew or should have known of [hazard], and what facts would establish that.
  2. A comparative or contributory fault analysis: conduct on my side that could reduce or bar recovery, and how the applicable rule treats it.
  3. The statute of limitations for a premises liability claim, and the date it runs from on these facts.
  4. The evidence to preserve now, including incident reports, video footage before it is overwritten, photographs, and witness contact details.
  5. An overall assessment of the claim's strength, stated as a range rather than a guarantee.
  Mandatory rules: cite the specific standard (statute, regulation or leading case) that governs notice and comparative fault, and identify which jurisdiction's rule you are applying. Do not state the limitations period as fixed without naming its source; flag it for confirmation given how sensitive filing deadlines are to jurisdiction and claim type.

• Medical Malpractice NoticeMemoExpertDraft / Generate

  I intend to bring a malpractice claim against [provider] arising from [procedure/diagnosis] on [date], which caused [injury]. Draft a notice of intent to sue that satisfies [jurisdiction]'s pre-suit requirements.
  Facts: the treatment [provider] actually provided, what a competent provider would have done differently, the medical records and imaging available, and any expert who has reviewed the case so far.
  Deliverables:
  1. A statement of the standard of care applicable to [procedure/diagnosis], and how [provider]'s conduct is alleged to have fallen below it.
  2. Causation: how the deviation from the standard of care produced [injury], distinct from a bad outcome that would have occurred regardless.
  3. The expert evaluation or certificate of merit [jurisdiction] requires before or alongside the notice, and what it must contain.
  4. The pre-suit notice period, waiting period, or mediation step [jurisdiction] imposes before a malpractice suit can be filed, and the deadline it runs from.
  5. Damages: the injury, treatment required to address it, and any permanent effect, stated as claimed rather than proven.
  6. The recipients the notice must be sent to and the method of service [jurisdiction] requires.
  Mandatory rules: cite the specific statute or rule of [jurisdiction] for the pre-suit notice period, expert certificate requirement and any statute of limitations that applies. Do not state that [provider]'s conduct breached the standard of care as an established fact; present it as the claim's theory, and flag that a qualified expert review is required before filing.

• Workplace Injury ClaimMemoAdvancedDraft / Generate

  I was injured at [employer] on [date] while doing [task], and the claim will be governed by [jurisdiction]. Help me prepare a workers' compensation claim.
  Facts: how the injury happened, whether I reported it to [employer] and when, the treatment received so far, and my job duties and pay rate before the injury.
  Deliverables:
  1. The notice deadline under [jurisdiction] for reporting a workplace injury to [employer] and to the compensation authority, and whether my timing meets it.
  2. The medical treatment process under [jurisdiction] rules: how to get treatment authorised, and any requirement to use a designated provider.
  3. Lost wage benefits: how they are calculated from my pre-injury pay rate under [jurisdiction]'s formula, and the waiting period before they start.
  4. The disability rating process once treatment concludes, and how it affects the benefit amount under [jurisdiction] law.
  5. Grounds on which [employer] or its insurer could dispute the claim, and how to respond to each.
  Mandatory rules: cite the specific [jurisdiction] workers' compensation statute or schedule for the notice deadline, wage calculation formula and disability rating method. Flag any figure you cannot attribute to that statute or schedule for confirmation rather than stating it as settled.

• Pain & Suffering MemoMemoAdvancedStrategy / Scenario

  Estimate a fair pain and suffering valuation for injuries: [list], requiring [treatment] over [recovery period], with [permanent effects].
  Facts: the medical expenses incurred to date, the jurisdiction where the claim will be brought, and any comparable settlement or verdict data available to me.
  Deliverables:
  1. A multiplier-method estimate: the medical expense base, the multiplier range appropriate to injuries like [list] and [permanent effects], and the reasoning for where in that range this claim sits.
  2. A per diem estimate: the daily rate used and the [recovery period] it is applied across, with the reasoning for the rate chosen.
  3. A comparison of the two methods and which better fits [permanent effects] specifically.
  4. A stated range rather than a single number, with the factors that would move the final settlement toward the top or bottom of it.
  Mandatory rules: do not present a multiplier, per diem rate or comparable verdict figure as established without naming where it came from (a specific comparable case, published verdict data, or an assumption you are explicitly flagging as such). Mark this valuation as an estimate for negotiation purposes, not a legal opinion on entitlement.

• Settlement NegotiationMemoAdvancedStrategy / Scenario

  I am negotiating a settlement of my injury claim. The insurer has offered [offer], and I believe my damages are [amount]. Help me build a counter position.
  Facts: the medical expenses and lost wages that make up [amount], any outstanding medical liens, and the strengths and weaknesses of liability on my facts.
  Deliverables:
  1. A counter-offer figure and the reasoning that supports moving from [offer] toward [amount], referencing the components of the damages.
  2. Comparable settlement or verdict data to cite, and what makes each comparable genuinely similar to this claim rather than superficially so.
  3. A lien negotiation approach: which liens exist, and how reducing them increases my net recovery even if the gross settlement does not move.
  4. A response to the likely insurer pushback on liability, causation or damages.
  5. A recommended walk-away point below which I should not settle without reassessing.
  Mandatory rules: do not cite a comparable verdict or settlement figure without describing the source you are drawing it from, or flag that it is illustrative rather than a verified comparable. Do not present [amount] as a fixed entitlement; treat it as the opening position it is.

• Medical Records RequestMemoStarterDraft / Generate

  Draft a data protection compliant request for my complete medical records from [provider], covering treatment between [dates]. State the records requested, the format (paper or electronic) and delivery method I want, and cite the specific right of access provision (HIPAA or the applicable local data protection law) that entitles me to them. Ask [provider] to confirm any fee and the statutory response deadline, and flag that deadline for me to confirm rather than assuming a fixed number of days.

Search all 391 prompts