Skills
Mandatory Verification
A practice-area skill: it carries legal knowledge — a doctrine, a regime, a review standard — and applies it to your material.
What this skill does
Mandatory external verification workflow for ALL non-trivial factual claims before presenting them as true. This skill MUST be used whenever Claude is asked to research any topic, answer factual questions, provide current information, draft documents containing factual claims, give legal advice or cite legal authority, discuss current events or public figures, provide technical or scientific information, state statistics or data points, or answer ANY question where the answer could have changed over time. Also trigger when the user asks Claude to 'check', 'verify', 'confirm', 'research', 'look up', or 'find out' anything, or when the user needs information that requires freshness, precision, or source accuracy. This skill overrides any default tendency to answer from memory. If a task involves stating facts, citing sources, or providing current information — use this skill.
- Mandatory
- Verification
Free, and published by its author - not by HAQQ. The link leaves this site.
Where it runs, and how to install it
Agent Skills are a format, not a product feature: a folder with a SKILL.md and whatever files it needs. Nothing inside one is model-specific.
- Claude
- Drop the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/, or upload it in Settings → Capabilities. Claude loads it when the description matches what you asked for.
- Claude Code
- Same folder, per-project instead: .claude/skills/ inside the repository, so the skill travels with the work rather than with the machine.
- Any agent that reads SKILL.md
- A skill is a folder with a SKILL.md and whatever files it needs. Nothing in the format is model-specific, so a runtime that reads the file reads the skill.
More from Larissa Meredith-Flister
- Persuasive Legal WritingApply elite legal writing techniques drawn from Justice Kagan, Boies & Olson, and other top advocates to any legal document — briefs, submissions, letters, opinions, memos, or persuasive correspondence. Covers both prose craft (clarity, concrete examples, parallel construction, voice, strategic quoting) and architectural strategy (argument sequencing, framing, openings, endings), plus a dedicated
- Judicial First ImpressionAssesses a legal argument, submission, or piece of structured reasoning from the perspective of a judge reading it cold under time pressure. Produces a structured seven-part assessment: what the case appears to be about, immediate points of confusion, what feels strong, what feels weak, what is assumed but unproved, a provisional confidence level (low/medium/high), and what would be needed to pers
- Source Locked VerificationForces Claude to answer only from user-provided materials and online sources it has actually accessed. No inference, no assumptions, no gap-filling. Every factual, legal, numerical, or procedural claim must be anchored to a cited source, with statements categorised as expressly stated, verified online, supported, not found, or labelled inference. Built for legal and evidential work where fidelity
- AI Audit TrailThis skill builds a structured audit trail of an AI-assisted task: what the tool was asked to do, what materials it was given, what it produced, how the output was verified, and what was ultimately relied upon. It documents the workflow for supervision and later review without ruling on privilege or disclosure, so the record stays accurate rather than self-serving.
- Client Explanation TranslatorTurn complex legal analysis into clear, commercially useful client-facing advice. Use this whenever the user has dense legal material — drafting, internal analysis, counsel notes, research memos, pleadings, a case update, or correspondence — and wants it converted into something a client can actually understand and act on. Trigger on phrases like 'explain this to the client', 'put this in plain English', 'translate this for a non-lawyer', 'turn this into client-facing advice', 'make this client-ready', 'draft a client update', or when the user shares legal analysis and asks 'what does this mean for them'. Also trigger when the user wants a board summary, litigation risk update, or call script derived from legal material. The skill preserves legal nuance, uncertainty, and risk rather than oversimplifying — it makes advice usable, not just simpler.
- Disclosure Strategy MapperThis skill maps disclosure strategy from a case summary, pleading, chronology, or early case theory: the document categories that will matter, likely custodians, adverse material, evidential gaps, search themes, and the risks worth confronting early.
Skills that do related work
- Red Team VerifierAdversarial verification for AI-generated legal content with systematic fact-checking, source validation, and quality control. Use when verifying legal document
- cite-guardPaste an AI-drafted legal filing and cite-guard extracts every case citation, checks each against a known-cases index, and returns a single hallucination-risk s
- Agent Authority Charter BuilderCreates an Agent Authority Charter for enterprise or regulated AI agents before deployment. Use this Skill when a user needs to define what an AI agent is allow
- Agentic Delegation AuditUse when a lawyer, legal team, or client needs to assess AI agents that can act on someone's behalf: send messages, search, draft, file, pay, delete, connect to
- AI Audit TrailThis skill builds a structured audit trail of an AI-assisted task: what the tool was asked to do, what materials it was given, what it produced, how the output
- AI Governance ReviewerConduct AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk reviews of internal AI use cases, AI product features, LLM workflows, or thi