Skip to content

Cross-model benchmark

Cross-Model Legal Benchmark

HAQQ's own measured benchmark scoring legal AI models out of 50 across legal task categories.

MesuréMis à jour 2026-07-08

HAQQ measured 19 models across 11 legal task categories, each scored out of 50. HAQQ's own engine (Justinian) leads most categories, including 49/50 on the top-scoring tasks, but it's not a clean sweep: Spellbook edges it out on contract drafting (46 vs. 44), LexisNexis leads legal research (46 vs. 43), and ChatGPT scores highest on plain-language explanation (45 vs. 42). Practical takeaway: no single model dominates every task, so choice should follow the workflow, not a leaderboard rank.

Les données

Cross-Model Legal Benchmark - HAQQ's own measured benchmark scoring legal AI models out of 50 across legal task categories.
ModelOverall /50GénéralRédaction de contratsRecherche juridiqueExplication du droitContrat de travailRédaction de mémosContrat de licencePacte d'actionnairesContrat de conseilContrat commercialRédaction de NDA
HAQQ (Justinian)45.84944434248444647454749
Claude Fable 542.74545414343414242424145
Claude Opus 4.740.84343393939414340394241
Mike OS39.14239353341393841404042
Harvey37.93840322742343944384340
DeepSeek v4 Pro36.84036383835373636363736
CoCounsel36.63738403137423537343537
Legora35.93342272640304039413839
ChatGPT 5.535.33934344533353232353435
Claude + legal plugins33.93535333534333434333334
Gemini 3.1 Pro32.93632364130323130303133
Spellbook32.92746182038204135373644
LexisNexis +AI32.03629462830382831272930
Grok 4.330.73331263628292928313532
Perplexity Sonar27.22922433424282323252424
Clio Duo25.62627242328232524292627
Meta Llama 423.82423232923242222242325
Mistral 322.42225202521222420222223
Qwen 3 Plus18.71918212217181817191819

Données mesurées - prétraitées à partir du jeu de données d'utilisation réel de l'Index Legal AI de HAQQ (plus de 134 000 points de données dans 30 pays) ou du propre banc d'essai juridique inter-modèles /50 de HAQQ.

Retour au rapport Legal AI Index

Recherches associées

Tous les graphiques de recherche