Legal Test Builder

What this skill does

Builds a high-fidelity interactive legal assessment as a single self-contained HTML artifact. Output includes a live countdown timer, contract review tasks with hover-annotated problem clauses, candidate answer textareas, model answers hidden behind reveal blocks, scenario-based legal memo tasks, strategy and function-building questions, and a pre-submission checklist that encodes the marking criteria. Use when the user needs to (1) assess a legal candidate with a realistic timed exercise, (2) train or onboard junior lawyers using problem sets rather than doctrine, (3) help a candidate prepare for a real take-home assessment they are facing, (4) build educational materials for law students, in-house teams, or compliance training, or (5) produce scenario-based training modules on specific legal topics. Triggers on "legal test", "take-home", "mock exam", "contract redline exercise", "candidate assessment", "legal training exercise", "practice test", or similar phrasing even when informal.

• Test

Where it runs, and how to install it

Agent Skills are a format, not a product feature: a folder with a SKILL.md and whatever files it needs. Nothing inside one is model-specific.

Claude

Drop the skill folder into ~/.claude/skills/, or upload it in Settings → Capabilities. Claude loads it when the description matches what you asked for.

Claude Code

Same folder, per-project instead: .claude/skills/ inside the repository, so the skill travels with the work rather than with the machine.

Any agent that reads SKILL.md

A skill is a folder with a SKILL.md and whatever files it needs. Nothing in the format is model-specific, so a runtime that reads the file reads the skill.

More from Patrick Munro

• Tech Contract NegotiatorGuide to negotiating technology services agreements, professional services contracts, and commercial B2B transactions. Provides three-position frameworks (provider-favorable, balanced, client-favorable), deal-size tactics, objection handling templates, and concession roadmaps. Use when: (1) Developing negotiation strategies for SaaS, cloud, or managed services agreements, (2) Preparing position pa
• Vendor Due DiligenceFramework for assessing IT service providers, technology vendors, and third-party partners. Creates structured risk assessments across financial, operational, compliance, security, and reputational dimensions with regulatory checklists (GDPR, DORA, NIS2, SOX). Use when: (1) Evaluating new vendors or technology providers, (2) Conducting third-party risk assessments for procurement, (3) Performing c
• Legal AI SimulatorFramework for demonstrating AI capabilities in legal contexts. Provides detailed personas across tenant law, business contracts, startup disputes, employment claims, and consumer protection with progressive complexity scenarios. Use when: (1) Demonstrating AI-powered legal triage or intake systems, (2) Showcasing responsible AI-assisted client interactions, (3) Training staff on appropriate AI use
• Red Team VerifierAdversarial verification for AI-generated legal content with systematic fact-checking, source validation, and quality control. Use when verifying legal documents, fact-checking regulatory content, performing red team review, or quality assurance before distribution to clients or stakeholders.
• Cross Regulatory Impact AnalyzerAnalyzes how multiple regulations interact for a specific product, service, or business model. Identifies where obligations overlap, reinforce, complement, duplicate, or conflict; builds a priority matrix; produces an integrated compliance timeline; and estimates the total compliance burden. Use when (1) scoping a new product or service against the full regulatory landscape before launch, (2) conducting M&A due diligence on a target's multi-regulation exposure, (3) building a strategic compliance roadmap where single-regulation analyses miss the interactions, (4) advising on complex situations where regulations touch the same conduct from different angles, or (5) estimating budget and resourcing for multi-regulation compliance. Primary coverage of EU digital regulation (GDPR, Data Act, AI Act, CRA, NIS2, DORA, DMA, DSA, ePrivacy) and national implementations; the framework extends to any jurisdiction where overlapping regulatory regimes apply to the same activity.
• Regulatory Deal Card GeneratorGenerates standalone interactive HTML "deal cards" that translate complex regulations into negotiation-ready reference tools, systematically distinguishing mandatory obligations from negotiable implementation choices. Use when the user needs an interactive regulatory guide for (1) contract negotiation support, (2) client education or internal training, (3) regulatory briefings for commercial stakeholders, or (4) structured comparison between required and flexible compliance paths. Primary focus on EU digital regulation (Data Act, AI Act, CRA, DORA, NIS2, GDPR) but the structural pattern transfers to any regulation where separating hard obligations from implementation choice is the point. Supports bilingual output where the jurisdiction calls for it.

Skills that do related work

• Agent Authority Charter BuilderCreates an Agent Authority Charter for enterprise or regulated AI agents before deployment. Use this Skill when a user needs to define what an AI agent is allow
• Agentic Delegation AuditUse when a lawyer, legal team, or client needs to assess AI agents that can act on someone's behalf: send messages, search, draft, file, pay, delete, connect to
• AI Audit TrailThis skill builds a structured audit trail of an AI-assisted task: what the tool was asked to do, what materials it was given, what it produced, how the output
• AI Governance ReviewerConduct AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk reviews of internal AI use cases, AI product features, LLM workflows, or thi
• Ai InventoryEU AI Act per-system inventory: track each AI system's role (provider, deployer, importer, distributor, authorized representative, product manufacturer) and ris
• Aia GenerationRun an AI impact assessment. Structured intake, risk analysis, regulatory classification per regime in scope, policy consistency diff, and recommendation with c