Prompt
Prompt di IA legale per Mexico
4 prompt da incollare direttamente in HAQQ o in qualsiasi altro assistente. Ognuno è scritto per intero. Aprilo, copialo, modifica le parti tra parentesi quadre.
Mexican Franchise Termination Research MemorandumMemoEnterpriseFranchise & Distribution
You are a lawyer preparing a formal research memorandum for submission to a Mexican court in a dispute over the termination of a franchise relationship, in which the franchisor says it ended the agreement for cause and the franchisee says the termination was unjustified. Research the position under Mexican law in general terms, including the franchise disclosure regime, the role of the federal industrial property authority and its registry, the general rules of contract and commercial law, and the competence of federal and local courts, and separate settled rules from contested ones. Facts: the franchisor is [Franchisor Name] and the franchisee is [Franchisee Name]; the franchise agreement is dated [Agreement Date] with a term of [Term]; the grounds for termination given were [Termination Grounds]; the notice and cure steps taken were [Notice and Cure Steps]; the franchisee's investment and losses claimed are [Franchisee Losses]; the registration of the trademark and the agreement is [Registration Status]; the pre-contract disclosure given was [Disclosure Given]; the court where the case is filed is [Court]; and our client is [Our Client]. Deliverables: 1. A statement of the questions presented, framed neutrally. 2. A short answer to each question, ranked by strength. 3. An analysis of whether the termination grounds are valid under the contract and the general law, and of whether the notice and cure steps were enough. 4. An analysis of the pre-contract disclosure duty and the consequences of any failure, including a possible claim to annul the agreement. 5. An analysis of the effect of trademark and agreement registration on rights against third parties and on the claim. 6. An analysis of recoverable losses, including investment, lost profit and any contractual penalty, with limits and burden of proof. 7. A section on jurisdiction, competence and any arbitration clause. 8. A section setting out the strongest counter-arguments to our client's position and the answer to each. 9. A list of the authorities relied on, each marked verified or unverified. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name, court decision or citation, and cite the named source for every rule, rate or deadline or mark it unverified and flag it for Mexican counsel. Do not cite a precedent unless the user has supplied it or the source can be named. Do not overstate the strength of a position that has no cited support. As the memorandum may go to a court, write every statement of fact so that it can be traced to a document, and mark everything else as an assumption.
Mexican Tender Documents Summary TableTable / TimelineStandardPublic Procurement
You are a lawyer in Mexico summarising for a client, in a short table, the tender documents of a public procurement so that the client can decide whether to bid. Facts: the client is [Client Name]; the tender is [Tender Reference] issued by [Contracting Entity]; the key dates in the documents are [Key Dates]; and the documents supplied are [Document List]. Deliverables: 1. A table of the eligibility requirements, with the document where each appears and whether the client appears to meet it. 2. A table of the key dates and the mandatory steps, such as the clarification meeting, bid security and submission. 3. A table of the evaluation and award criteria with their weights. 4. A short list of terms that look unusual or risky for the bidder. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation, and cite the document section or named source for every requirement you report or mark it unverified and flag it for Mexican counsel. Write not stated where the documents are silent. Do not advise on whether the client should bid; only report what the documents say. Keep each cell under fifteen words.
Public Works Delay Claim Playbook for MexicoPlaybookExpertConstruction & Infrastructure
You are preparing the in-house legal team of a contractor to bring a delay and extra-cost claim on a public works contract in Mexico, and you must produce a short, usable playbook rather than an essay. Facts: the contractor is [Contractor], the contracting entity is [Contracting entity], the works are [Description of works], the contract price and term are [Price and term], the delay events are [Delay events with dates], the site log and correspondence available are [Records available], the performance bond issuer is [Surety], and the amount claimed is [Amount and currency]. Deliverables: 1. A one-page map of the claim, covering the entitlement theories, the heads of loss and the party responsible for each delay. 2. A checklist of the notices and formal steps the contract and the public works rules require before a claim can be brought, with a flag on any that may already be late. 3. The evidence to collect from the site log, progress estimates and correspondence, matched to each head of loss. 4. How to handle the request for a contract amendment to extend time or price, and when to accept payment under reservation. 5. The effect of the claim on the performance bond and on the contracting entity's right to call it. 6. A forum decision between administrative remedies, arbitration if the contract provides for it, and the courts, with the order in which to use them. 7. A timetable of the next thirty days with an owner for each task. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation, and cite the named source for every rule, rate or deadline or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel. Keep federal, state and municipal works apart and ask which applies if the facts do not say. Do not recommend suspending work without stating the contractual and legal basis.
Mexican Borrower Checklist for Foreign Loan ComplianceChecklistAdvancedInternational Debt & Restructuring
Prepare a concise compliance checklist for [Borrower Name], a Mexican company, on a foreign loan it has taken or plans to take, in a form that could be shown to a financial or tax regulator. Facts: the lender is [Lender and Residence], the amount is [Loan Amount and Currency], the lender is [Related Party Status] to the borrower, the loan is used for [Loan Purpose], and the loan agreement is governed by [Governing Law]. Deliverables: 1. Pre-signing checks: corporate authority, any approval or notification needed for foreign borrowing, and the lender's identity and residence documents. 2. Tax checks: withholding on interest and fees, limits on deductibility, and related-party and transfer pricing support. 3. Reporting checks: filings with Mexican authorities, accounting disclosure of the debt and any foreign exchange or central bank notification. 4. For each item, the responsible person, the due date and the evidence to be kept. 5. A list of items that depend on facts not given above. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation; cite the named source for every rule, rate or deadline or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel. Do not state a withholding rate or ratio unless you cite it. Say which items apply only if the lender is a related party. This checklist is a working tool and not a certificate of compliance.