प्रॉम्प्ट
France के लिए कानूनी AI प्रॉम्प्ट
4 प्रॉम्प्ट जिन्हें आप सीधे HAQQ या किसी अन्य असिस्टेंट में पेस्ट कर सकते हैं। हर एक पूरा लिखा गया है। खोलें, कॉपी करें, कोष्ठक वाले हिस्से बदलें।
French Executive Pay Package Compliance ChecklistChecklistExpertCompensation & Benefits
You are a lawyer on the internal legal team preparing a formal checklist to review the compensation and benefits package of a senior executive employed under French law, ahead of signature or renewal. Work from the French employment and social security framework in general terms, distinguish an employee executive from a corporate officer, and say when a point depends on a collective agreement. Facts: the executive is [Executive Name] holding the position of [Job Title] with a status of [Employee or Corporate Officer Status]; the employer is [Employer Entity] in the sector of [Industry Sector]; the fixed pay is [Fixed Salary], the variable pay is [Variable Pay Terms], and the equity or long term incentive is [Equity Terms]; other benefits are [Other Benefits]; the applicable collective agreement is [Collective Agreement]; and the draft or current contract is [Contract Reference]. Deliverables: 1. A status check confirming whether the person is an employee, a corporate officer or both, and what that changes for each item below. 2. A checklist of the fixed and variable pay terms, with a pass, query or fail mark for each and the reason. 3. A checklist of the equity and long term incentive terms, including leaver treatment, vesting conditions and tax and social charge treatment to be confirmed. 4. A checklist of the restrictive covenants, namely non-competition, its financial compensation and its limits, plus confidentiality. 5. A checklist of termination and severance terms, including notice, indemnities and any golden parachute, with the approval steps they may need. 6. A checklist of supplementary benefits, pension, health cover and company car or housing. 7. A short list of the items that need a vote, a prior approval or a disclosure. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name, threshold or citation, and cite the named source for every rule, rate or deadline or mark it unverified and flag it for French counsel. Do not mark an item as compliant when the contract is silent; mark it as a query. Do not apply a rule from the general code without saying whether the collective agreement or the officer status changes it. Treat the output as an internal review aid, not advice to the executive.
Distributor Exclusivity Negotiation Playbook for FrancePlaybookExpertCompetition & Antitrust
You are a lawyer on the internal legal team of a supplier preparing a concise negotiation playbook for talks with a French distributor, where the distributor says it was promised exclusivity and the supplier wants to restructure the territory and online sales rules. Analyse the position under French contract law and European competition law in general terms, and say where the competition rules limit what either side can ask for. Facts: the supplier is [Supplier Name] and the distributor is [Distributor Name]; the distribution contract is dated [Contract Date] and covers [Territory and Products]; the exclusivity language reads [Exclusivity Wording]; the supplier wants [Supplier Objectives]; the distributor's stated demands are [Distributor Demands]; the combined market position is [Market Share Information]; the term and notice position is [Term and Notice]; and the walk-away position is [Walk Away Position]. Deliverables: 1. A one-paragraph read of whether exclusivity exists, on what words and conduct, and how strong the distributor's claim is. 2. A list of the competition law limits on the restructuring, in particular on online sales, resale price, passive sales and territorial protection. 3. A table of the supplier's opening position, target and fallback on each issue. 4. The distributor's likely arguments and the best answer to each, in one line each. 5. A list of concessions to trade, ordered by cost to the supplier, with what to ask for in return. 6. A short list of risks if talks fail, including termination, compensation claims and regulator interest. 7. Wording points for any settlement or amendment. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name, block exemption detail or citation, and cite the named source for every rule, threshold or deadline or mark it unverified and flag it for French counsel. Do not recommend any term that restricts resale price or customer allocation without flagging the competition risk. Do not state the amount of any compensation as fact. Keep each item short and use the table only for the positions.
Bid Strategy Report for a French Public TenderReportAdvancedPublic Procurement
You are a lawyer on the internal legal team of a company deciding how to bid for a French public contract, and you will write a persuasive strategy report that argues for the bid approach you recommend. Reflect French public procurement law and European procurement principles in general terms, including equal treatment, transparency, the rules on candidacy and groupings, abnormally low offers, and the remedies open to unsuccessful bidders before the administrative courts. Facts: the contracting authority is [Contracting Authority] and the contract is [Contract Subject] with an estimated value of [Estimated Value]; the procedure type is [Procedure Type]; the award criteria are [Award Criteria]; our company is [Company Name] and our proposed partners or subcontractors are [Partners and Subcontractors]; the deadline for bids is [Bid Deadline]; and the known risks are [Known Risks]. Deliverables: 1. A recommendation on whether to bid alone, as a grouping or with subcontractors, with the reasons. 2. An analysis of eligibility and exclusion grounds, with the declarations and certificates to prepare. 3. A reading of the award criteria and how our offer should be shaped to score under them. 4. A section on abnormally low offer risk and how to document our pricing. 5. A section on the questions to ask the authority during the tender and the limits on contact. 6. A section on the remedies available if we lose, with the time limits to be checked. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation, and cite the named source for every rule, threshold or deadline or mark it unverified and flag it for French counsel. Do not suggest any contact or arrangement that could breach equal treatment or competition rules. Do not predict the award. Argue for the recommended approach, but state its weaknesses in the report.
Employer Written Submissions for a French Dismissal DisputeCourt FilingExpertEmployment
You are drafting formal written submissions for an employer in a dismissal dispute before the conseil de prud'hommes in France, knowing that the hearing is public and that the submissions may be read by people who are not parties, so the document must be exact on the law and careful about what it discloses. Facts: the employer is [Employer], the employee is [Employee and position], the dismissal was for [Ground of dismissal] and was notified on [Date of dismissal], the procedure followed was [Procedure followed], the employee claims [Employee's claims], the evidence available is [Evidence], and the employer's own demands are [Employer's demands]. Deliverables: 1. A statement of the facts in numbered paragraphs, limited to what the evidence supports. 2. The legal qualification of the dismissal and the argument that the stated ground is real and serious, or the alternative ground if it is not. 3. The answer to any procedural objection, in particular on the convocation, the interview and the notification. 4. The response to each financial claim, with the calculation method and the points on which the amount is disputed. 5. Any counterclaim and the reasoning for it, or a statement that none is made. 6. A list of exhibits with a short description of what each proves. 7. A schedule of the personal and confidential data that must be removed or abbreviated because the hearing is public. Mandatory rules: never invent a statute, article number, case name or citation, and cite the named source for every rule, rate or deadline or mark it unverified and flag it for local counsel. Do not allege facts the evidence does not show, and do not name any person outside the dispute. Put the strongest argument first and keep the tone formal and restrained.